Sig Shop (and maybe some avatars)

[chA1nBull3t]

You guys should stop arguing over whether PNG or GIFs are better. Both suck.

Save For Web -> JPG at 100% Quality.
Unless you want transparencies in your images, use JPG, no sacrifice in quality, small image sizes, most widely used image format, and no worries of loading problems.

Um. No.
JPG images support 16 million color but are lossy (horrible compression too).
GIF images support 256 colors (lossess but shitty in color and tone).
PNG is lossless, supports 256 colors but also the 24-bit that jpeg's do. It's great in quality AND it compresses black color. (Pretty much, they're .gif files on crack)

 

[Rock Raiyu]

^Is right. In my opinion, .png are great for artwork while .jpg are great for photographs and such. If you are worried about size, change it to a .jpg as it lowers the size but may lose a bit of quality. Most of my sigs go over the limit so I just put them in .jpg format and lower the size that way. And its hardly noticeable.

Since my photoshop for some reason doesn't want to cooperate with me, and I can't be bothered to fix it, I'll make a request in here.

Username Rock Raiyu? I don't want it on the signature though.
Requesting [Sig/Avatar]: Avatar/signature set.
Size [400x180/350x150/350x115]: 350 x 150
Render/Stock:
Avatar: http://planetrenders.net/renders/displayimage.php?pos=-45664
Signature: http://planetrenders.net/renders/displayimage.php?pos=-48373

General Colors [Warm Colors, Purple, Cold Colors etc.]: Warm colors
Whether or not you mind me signing it [Your name then the small white -epuls/-iced]: I don't really care. You made the set so you deserve credit.

 

[Jaems]

You guys should stop arguing over whether PNG or GIFs are better. Both suck.

Save For Web -> JPG at 100% Quality.
Unless you want transparencies in your images, use JPG, no sacrifice in quality, small image sizes, most widely used image format, and no worries of loading problems.

Um. No.
JPG images support 16 million color but are lossy (horrible compression too).
GIF images support 256 colors (lossess but shitty in color and tone).
PNG is lossless, supports 256 colors but also the 24-bit that jpeg's do. It's great in quality AND it compresses black color. (Pretty much, they're .gif files on crack)

Sorry, brah, maybe I'm not as much as a visua-phile as you, or maybe I'm kinda blind, or maybe my HD monitor sux, but I don't notice any difference.

png-

jpg-

 

[luke_c]

You guys should stop arguing over whether PNG or GIFs are better. Both suck.

Save For Web -> JPG at 100% Quality.
Unless you want transparencies in your images, use JPG, no sacrifice in quality, small image sizes, most widely used image format, and no worries of loading problems.

Um. No.
JPG images support 16 million color but are lossy (horrible compression too).
GIF images support 256 colors (lossess but shitty in color and tone).
PNG is lossless, supports 256 colors but also the 24-bit that jpeg's do. It's great in quality AND it compresses black color. (Pretty much, they're .gif files on crack)

 

[Jaems]

Well, yeah. But I thought this thread was about signatures?
I understand saving as PNG for storage, but compressing as PNGs for use on discussion boards doesn't make much sense to me.

 

[MegaAce™]

Rock Raiyu, here's your request.

Meh, I'm getting pretty bad, must practice more..

sorry, this is all I could do now