Viewing NFO's On Each Release

[T-hug]

Hi I think now GBA-NFO.com has died we should add a link on each release's infos to view the associated NFO.

Thx.

 

[djgarf]

Funny how 1636 and 1637 seem to be the same.

i see fire red for 1636 and green leaf for 1637 here

 

[Hunter]

Funny how 1636 and 1637 seem to be the same.

i see fire red for 1636 and green leaf for 1637 here

thats coz i fixed it

 

[dice]

Geez! Calm down do any of you read?

THERE WILL BE A SIMPLE LINK where the ROM information is under the ROM release on the portal, directly under "ROM Serial" for people that care, to click on where the NFO will load and be readable without download to your PC!

Example:

Look at my post above to see what the output is like...

OMG you did what I said!

PARTAY!

 

[mekaxero]

i got the same image that hunter00 posted on the second page, no matter which link i click on for an nfo, i get this picture:

anyone know y it is doing this? It does it both with IE and FireFox.

 

[Hunter]

i got the same image that hunter00 posted on the second page, no matter which link i click on for an nfo, i get this picture:

anyone know y it is doing this? It does it both with IE and FireFox.

i do

you browser or proxy server are blocking redirect references


xx.xxx.xx.xx - - [15/Sep/2004:03:43:25 +1000] "GET /nfo/0300.png HTTP/1.1" 404 658 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040626 Firefox/0.8"


that bold part should show....

http://gbatemp.net/index.php?act=nfo&code=0300

 

[Puck The Joker]

Both 1647 & 1648 work fine for me by just clicking on them. I am running Firefox 0.8 for your info.

 

[Hunter]

1.8 or 0.8

 

[Puck The Joker]

1.8 or 0.8

Sorry, I meant 5.8. I have a really, really advanced copy. Its so far advanced that I can't even use a tenth of the features since today's technology is far too primitive.

I am using 0.8, I'm tired and at work, so I easily make mistakes at this time of day.

 

[mekaxero]

hunter: i guess u used the code in ur other post, as it was appearing the same as in teh image there. and i just tried it again and it does the same thing. weird. guess its a feature i miss out on, stupid supposedly state-of-the-art computer(as of 4 months ago)

 

[Hunter]

hunter: i guess u used the code in ur other post, as it was appearing the same as in teh image there. and i just tried it again and it does the same thing. weird. guess its a feature i miss out on, stupid supposedly state-of-the-art computer(as of 4 months ago)

it may not be your fault it may be your isp's