D
Deleted User
Guest
OP
I see a lot that the media praises when a woman gets hired for whatever job or an African person gets the job, my point is, as a kid I was taught that people should be judged by their skills, qualifications and experience rather than what sex they have between their legs or their race.
I know that companies hire Africans, Asians and etc based on diversity hire which diminishes them as they probably worked hard to get there and then the only thing the employer notices is their ethnicity/race, making everything they studied for kinda pointless.
Britain had a female Prime Minister, but she was just as incompetent as her male counterparts so why be glad it's a woman? I reckon, most people would want someone stable and competent to run a country than be concerned if it's a he/she or the race (European / African / Asian / etc).
You know, Mr. Martin Luther King said it perfectly himself. Why did so many forget his wise words?
I know that companies hire Africans, Asians and etc based on diversity hire which diminishes them as they probably worked hard to get there and then the only thing the employer notices is their ethnicity/race, making everything they studied for kinda pointless.
Britain had a female Prime Minister, but she was just as incompetent as her male counterparts so why be glad it's a woman? I reckon, most people would want someone stable and competent to run a country than be concerned if it's a he/she or the race (European / African / Asian / etc).
You know, Mr. Martin Luther King said it perfectly himself. Why did so many forget his wise words?