trustzonehax for lifeCool!
But please, we need to get rid of the *hax names, they get really repetitive
meh, easy to tell it's an exploit if they call it *hax. So I don't mind a bit personally.Cool!
But please, we need to get rid of the *hax names, they get really repetitive
"Get on 3.0" They said.... "Stay on 3.0" They said...! Did they lie to us?!
If 3.0 won't get Trustzonehax as well soon I will be angry!!!
Oh no... whatever shall we do?If 3.0 won't get Trustzonehax as well soon I will be angry!!!
Piracy is also theoretically possible on 3.0.0 with just the kernel exploit that SciresM has already managed.Oh no... whatever shall we do?
Seriously, if you want HOMEBREW 3.0 is fine. You obviously want piracy so it isn't the same thing.
Maybe, but it will be stuck there most likely? Since 3.0.1 fix the bug right?Piracy is also theoretically possible on 3.0.0 with just the kernel exploit that SciresM has already managed.
No, SciresM has kernel on versions up to and including 3.0.2.Maybe, but it will be stuck there most likely? Since 3.0.1 fix the bug right?
If the trustzonehax works and his emunand works, 1.X and 2.X people can in theory run emunand and run the latest versions.
My understanding is CFW and emuNAND are also possible with kernel.Ahahah so we get emunand and cfw on 2.x and not just 1.x ? Oh man scalpers won’t be happy. Nice work dev!
I see. Well maybe it might work then.No, SciresM has kernel on versions up to and including 3.0.2.
My understanding is CFW and emuNAND are also possible with kernel.
It's possible but insanely difficult to port. "Like biting your dick off"No, SciresM has kernel on versions up to and including 3.0.2.
My understanding is CFW and emuNAND are also possible with kernel.
Nah, it isn't "might be possible", it is possible lol@SciresM Wow, these are great news. Congrats.
That means that Emunand or CFW might be possible on 2.X. My 2.3.0 Switch is looking forward to this.