I don't entirely understand what's going on here, so I'm going to sidestep it.
You bet. See above for why.
I never did this.
A person's gender identity doesn't necessarily comport with one's physiological sex. So, for example, a trans woman can have a penis. Respectfully, the idea that the world is as black and white as you make it out to be is a pretty immature worldview. I mean that literally, not insultingly.
That sounds like a personal problem, because we don't even have to use the labels
sex and
gender. You should be able to understand if I use words like
identity and
physiology instead.
Regardless, I'm noticing the irony is lost on you here.
Are you unaware that
@Damon_girl and I were having a conversation that only pertained to the topic of the historical uses of the words
sex and
gender? I'm starting to believe you're not reading my posts.
- Intersex people existed in the 1960s, regardless of what was put onto one's birth certificate.
- Sex and gender are two different things, so what was put onto the birth certificate isn't necessarily relevant to one's gender identity. If you don't want to acknowledge that, then all you need to know is that physiology is not the same thing as one's identity. One is the body, and one is the brain.