You should create a new thread for your builds, so we can discuss about it. I couldn't grab the file.
Having competing threads wouldn't help any more than it would just add more confusion for users. I don't think that's particularly worth it for the difference of
a single core...
I imagine this is pretty low priority for most people, but does anyone have a working version of the Virtual Boy core for Vita Retroarch. I don't think it's been able to boot in the few years I've been using the Vita port, but it still listed in the opening post in this thread as working.
Checked latest nightly and last stable, works fine. :shrug:
Still slow as hell, though, even with 'fast' CPU emulation.
And to answer the following...
Sorry, two noob RetroArch questions
(did a search and couldn't spot an answer)
1) Whats the difference between the getting the Retroarch Assets via
bundle.zip and
RetroArch_data.7z ? Although the instructions ( ) say both methods are the same, there's a big difference in size of the two files and the subfolders in both are different.
What bundle.zip? The buildbot only has the
.vpk package, and the corresponding data files.
Otherwise, the OP stands true.
2) When a new stable version of the RetroArch vpk is released, there's no need to update the assets, right?
Unless Libretro suggests to update assets, or you notice a substantial size difference in the data package, there's no need to keep assets updated.
In other news, other than being able to confirm that Hatari works (which I
think is fullspeed? It turns out what few floppy images I have are a bust...), the NeoCD core has been added. Be sure to transfer over a dedicated BIOS folder for this one.
Unfortunately, while it does work as intended, the performance is
just out of reach enough in games to be annoying, as it yet again thrashes pretty hard against just one of the available CPU cores. Even with an overclock, Crossed Swords II will be averaging ~50fps.
Where does Dynarec stand for the Vita cores right now?
What dynarec? That's up to core developers.
AFAIK, no cores available right now, aside from (I guess?) the higher end Mednafen stuff lack any necessary changes to their implementations, or a dynarec to implement in the first place. It's a standard ARM chipset, which most - if not all - cores that can, utilize some implementation already.
What you see, is what you get.