No, you had to dissect it because you couldn't understand it and now that it's laid upon the table you want to imply that my argument was convoluted in order to discredit my position.
Try again bud.
It's not even complicated. You proposed he was a hypocrite because he called someone names and also claimed he was capable of holding a conversation. When shown that both are possible, you broke down and claimed that you felt like he was treating someone unfairly... which could have be an issue. And the idea that it could be an issue was good enough. You cancelled yourself and showed us that it didn't even matter.
Or. The father could provide the needs. A guardian. A sibling. Random strangers.
Originally the question was about the difference between a late term fetus and a newborn infant aside from location. I've answered the question and anything you and Trader have referred to in reply to this specific question has all been deflection because the point has been argued and settled and you want to throw tantrums instead of spurring actual debate.
Try again. Harder and with some effort this time.
Your rebuttal: what about strangers?!
Lol.
Making fun of your stupid (and settled) answer = tantrum.
I hope I can forgive myself.