really, like literally the thing i said after that part you quoted. because voting restrictions help them by preventing first and foremost, poor, elderly and lets say, racially diverse parts of the population, from casting their vote. (which are currently much more likely to support the democratic party)
but maybe you're more of a visual type, so here's an extremely simplified video that might explain the gist of it to you
No, I didnt. Voting for Trump is the ONE AND ONLY thing that sends I message I want Trump. Voting for someone that is neither of them sends the message that I refuse to support either of them, and unless Im given a 1st party candidate better than what I was given I wont vote first party. Dont deal with shit bag politicians who will cheat their ass off to run the country. Trump is far less desirable, I agree but im not going to say I want Hillary, which is literally what voting for her does, when I can vote for someone I ACTUALLY WANT. Its a matter of principle and sending a message to the dem party "next time, send someone better because I have proven I WILL refuse to support anyone if its someone like Hillary" where as voting for her says you will give in and support a scumbag like her if the opposition is even worse, and the dem party establishment can and will take advantage of complacency like that.
it doesn't matter how you're trying to justify your decision to yourself and everyone around you after the fact. objectively, you voted for trump and because you would have known that, you can't argue 'MY VOTE WAS MEANT TO REPRESENT THIS THING OR THAT'. because it doesn't.
you're in a majority type of voting system. you could pull that stuff in germany, where its not majority and winner takes all. but you aren't.
your vote only had two possible purposes. help clinton or help trump. nothing else.
and you chose help trump, who's only chance to win, from the getgo, was idiots like you throwing their vote away in his favor.
and your vote didn't send any message to the dem party other than 'next time, send someone who's basically like trump'. you have not proven anything other than that you are among the people who'd throw their vote away and let their own country burn for their own egotistical reasons.
allowing that man to win is going to shape your countries political playing field for potentially decades to come and not in a good way. because the same way the parties believed 30 years ago that the optimal candidate had to be big with broad shoulders, they're going to learn that in some way, a donald trump represented qualities that are winning factors for the next candidates.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
According to satellite images, we right now have more green plants on earth than ever before, caused by CO2. This was a surprise for many scientist and is called global greening. But it still gets warmer and according to geology, the ice of the poles will melt completely in any warm age. And we are in a war age right now. Stopping climate change is an impossible task and nobody knows the effect of the expected magnetic field shift on climate.
unfortunately, a few shrubs don't happen to have the same impact on climate change as keeping trees that have grown and absorbed co2 for hundreds of years.
no scientist was truly surprised by co2 supporting plant growth. its still getting warmer because those shrubs can't absorb as much co2 meaning its all still mostly in the atmosphere, causing greenhouse effect (together with all that methane that happens to be a byproduct of the meatindustry)
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
I am a Democrat and I didn't vote 'cause I wasn't going to vote for Hillary and I didn't like trump.
Still don't .
Jax
Sent from my SM-S120VL using Tapatalk
good for you. watch the republican party pass restrictive voting laws over the next 4 years in all the states they won, so next time the dems throw in a qualified candidate that isn't hillary, he won't have a chance even with your vote
@
BigOnYa:
@
K3Nv2:
@
ZeroT21:
