I've read 1984, but I've never even heard of these other books. Are they any good?
Erm...I'm not sure how to reply to that. This is a "favourite book" thread, so I obviously think they're indeed very good. Very different from one another as well, obviously. Lemme give you some more info on each:
Sophie's world is basically "what philosophy should be...but isn't". It's partially a novel of a young girl (Sophie) who starts to get private philosophy lessons from a mysterious teacher. It's not heavy-handed at all, but explores the deep questions of our existence. The other part is an actual course on Western philosophy. This might seem boring at times, but because this as well is written in human language (ever tried reading philosophy? It has so many definitions and phrases that it's not even funny anymore) it's interesting as well. It's a child's book...but one that doesn't patronize you.
The great and secret show...it's especially the first part (say about 50 or 60 pages) that truly sets the stage. It's a struggle that you can define as 'good versus evil', but not JUST that. It's about a world behind this world, and two persons working together to explore this, and in the end realizing they're on opposite sides. And it starts unusual but in a very believable manner.
The rest of the book is great as well. Barker is very good at building a fantasy world (Imajica, Weaveworld and Abarat are also among my favorite literature) but this one stands out even among these (Everville, however, is but an 'okay' sequel).
The never ending story...I've seen the 80s/90s movies first (1st and 2nd, that is). The book explores the lore far, far better. Okay, it's (again) a child's book. But one I hold very deeply in my heart.
The last two...I really don't know how to say it better. I've mentioned that I'm into BDSM a few times, but as this is a gaming forum, it's not something I talk about a lot (why should you? We're here to discuss games. Okay, and some other things. But I'm certainly not here to convince anyone. And I'm not sure I want to talk about it, considering minors might be listening). But to me, I REALLY wished I came across these books about ten years earlier. But noooo...my local library only had a copy of "histoire d'O". Don't get me wrong: it was a novel that was far ahead of its time and turned some ideas of feminism on its head. However, times have changed and things are far more normalized now. The idea that BDSM is some sort of strict hierarchy where wearing latex/leather is obligated, things are all about pain (if they're not about bondage), and so on and so on. The problem is also partially because we don't especially distance ourselves from any of it, but rather encourage interested people into (safely) experimenting with sexual ideas to see what fits them.
And that's where these books shine. The new bottoming book is mostly about the submissive/masochistic/receiving/bottoming side (yeah...we've got a whole bunch of names to give to the person to that person), the new topping book is more about the dominant/sadistic/giving/topping side (I could probably list about ten different names for somewhat the same activity
). But both are written in a clear, simple, personal-but-effective way. The reason I wanted these books read ten years earlier is because those stories of O and writings of De Sade made me think I was a weird creep. Since then, I learned to accept that part ("okay, so I AM a weird creep. Sure beats being boring
"), because consensuality is key. Everything that's been done to one another is with full agreement and within what they can and want to handle.
...and I can just keep on yapping about it, but again: it's all in the book. An absolute must if you're unsure on your sexual preferences but want to know about it. If it's nothing for you but you've got a friend, then Easton and Hardi's "When someone you know is kinky" is probably a better book for you (haven't read that, but basically everything they write is great. Including "the ethical slut", which deals with polyamory, btw).