so you think the bible is the only place where God is referenced?*believes the fucking bible*
so you think the bible is the only place where God is referenced?*believes the fucking bible*
I have. He was in some woods with his family. I'm Cereal, why won't anyone take me Cereal! Wahhhhhhh!Has anyone seen manbearpig? I'm totally cereal!
Causing a nuclear winter is a really bad too though. Short term, it may help, but more than likely in the long run, it will just end up exacerbating the problem.True, but when the alternative is uhhh... Really bad, to put it mildly, I don't see a lot of options.
Lol no, but it's literally a book of lies and has the most concentrated use of religious figures and ideals that you'll find (I mean, it's the bible).so you think the bible is the only place where God is referenced?
Ok who the hell changed warming to waming
Go for it man, I'll be right behind you...if we all adopt butt plug to stop adding methane in the air
and then do big ones for cows...
Please, not another Elon Musk. The guy might be a genius, but I firmly believe that if we listened to him for everything we'd end up erasing our own existence. Nukes are not a good solution to anything, they cause too much harm.I was doing a bit of research on nuclear winter.
Y'all can already see where this is going. I'm not sure if I'm misunderstanding something, but would it be possible to detonate a couple of nukes in the stratosphere to slow down, if not reverse global warming?
At first I've been skeptical myself. But after learning how carbon dioxide molecules behave when hit by heat radiation and light it became very clear to me.
But I don't think reducing our CO2 emissions would be enough. If we want to re-balance the global temperature we will have to regrow the destroyed forests for 2 reasons: First getting CO2 separated into carbon and oxygen. Second using the plants for active temperature reduction. Trees consume a lot of energy to do their photosynthesis and maintain their metabolism. They also release water out of their leaves which quickly evaporates. The change from a liquid state to vaporous consumes a lot of warmth from the immediate area. The same effect sweat cools down our body.
Looking at just the U.S., trees alone take up 6 times the area of all the cities and towns in the country put together.That's a good long term solution. The problem is I'm worried we won't have the time for trees to be regrown. From what I understand, we're in imminent danger.
well, getting rid of humanity would also solve the problem>Detonate a couple of nukes in the stratosphere
>Let metric-shitloads of radiation rain down onto the earth.