I can't enumerate how many believe it, but
here is a research paper on it. I'm not sure if scientists have really gone in depth before about the effects of a co-infection with a parasite. It will interesting to see if it holds true.
This is what I was getting at, if people most at risk from covid 19 have pre-existing conditions then treating them for that condition would be a good thing. Ivermectin is a treatment for parasitic infections.
Treating everyone for random undiagnosed conditions, when there is a risk for every treatment, would seem to be unwise.
He ridiculed people who thought Ivermectin could have antiviral properties. It does have them.
Whether it helps against COVID is not conclusive. Another study shows a high effectiveness, though the sample size was also rather low. The problem of this study has been mentioned by others. The biggest one (in my view): how late it was given (and that the patients were treated differently and could figure out whether they were given a placebo).
What do you mean by "antiviral properties"? What testing was done, were there any flaws in the testing?
listen to me, seriously genuinely, get help, ill pay for it, if you think for one second that they thought that a random repair man would come forward with this is obvious, you have a and i have to be pc here " neurodivergence" and should get that looked at. If this were true and that obvious, wouldnt we be hearing dirt on tons of big shots all the time? i dont see any dirt on koala harris, or jenn pataki or anyone like that, but i am open to maybe missing something.
listen to me, seriously genuinely, get help, I won't pay for it, if you think for one second that whomever took the laptop to this guy didn't expect him to come forward.
We don't hear dirt on tons of big shots, because they aren't stupid enough to take laptops to random repair men.
Other people aren't so intelligent
https://abc7chicago.com/robert-watson-des-moines-iowa-child-porn/5284651
You are missing something.
I wonder why a repair man bothered to look through the data, take a copy, alert the FBI and when they seize the laptop, give the copy to Rudy Giuliani. It kinda sounds planned. It's also rather convenient it was a legally blind repair man who can't say that it was Hunter Biden, only that the person said their name was Hunter Biden and wrote that down.
Whether any individual email is real or not is irrelevant as it's tainted, however the FBI are using it to investigate and may find corroborating evidence.
Right of course he is, the ballot fairy helped him win, in the most free and fair election ever.
heres the thing i really wanna focus on though, and i know you wont because you are petrified so you are gonna pick everything else apart
the point is he MIGHT has used it, so the information in it MIGHT be related to him, which may me he DID make overseas business deals while his dad was VP, we dont know, thats literally, and again, please ill pay for it so get help THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT, just because you dont like it, doesnt make it russian propaganda or untrue, but im under the assumption you are a flat earther am i right?
It appears that it was the most free and fair election ever, small numbers of fraud and mistakes didn't make any difference to the result. The evidence that you and your crackpots were throwing around was fake and based on misidentifying people.
You come across as pretty unstable, but also pretty rude. I'm not sure if you think this makes you effective in discussions, but I can assure you it does not.
It doesn't matter if he "MIGHT" have used it, that is not evidence. It is pure propaganda to try to keep the deluded engaged.
We know that Russia hacked Hilary Clinton, why not Hunter Biden? You know, they "MIGHT" have. Is that not good enough for you? It seems it is when it's something you believe, just not when it's something you don't. As if you have different standards for evidence for things based on your own belief. You might not realize how disastrous that is for your ability to identify what is actually true or not.
No, I'm not a flat earther, you are more likely to be one out of the two of us. Your thought process would be "Hey, it "MIGHT" be flat, the elite "MIGHT" be trying to fake the evidence".
Anyway, you seem to have gone from "It was definitely Hunter that took it to the shop" to "I never said that, it was likely an aide or secret service" to "We don't know if it's his laptop, but it might be".
You seem to be agreeing with me now anyway, I have no idea whose laptop it is or if Hunter Biden ever used it. For all I know, it "MIGHT" be yours. The contents might lead the FBI to some criminal activity or not, but it's not going to convict him of anything on it's own. You could scribble "I done it, signed Hunter Biden" and post it to the FBI and it would be as useful as evidence.