You're wrong. As soon as it looked like Trump was going to win plans were being made by the Democrats to impeach him for whatever reason they could find. Discussions of the planned impeachment can be found before he even won the election or took office. Further replies about this subject by you will be ignored as it's factual history. I know Democrats like to rewrite history to their liking, but I'm not going to forget what took place.
Impeachment didn't happen before late 2019, whether or not some people talked about doing it beforehand. If I remember correctly, there were attempts to impeach the former president before 2019, and they were voted down by the Democrats, so I'm not sure what your problem is, and I'm personally uninterested in anything other than the actual impeachment efforts.
My biases? I'm an independent. I don't like half the shit each side pulls.
You just called Democratic politicians "shitty people" while saying Republicans don't need to stoop as low as them (suggesting they aren't inherently "shitty people" like the Democratic politicians are). I do not believe you are an independent, but that doesn't matter.
So you don't personally like the recount
It isn't that I personally dislike the fake audit. The problem is the audit is expensive, led by Qanon conspiracy theorists, is a fishing expedition, the election has already in part been legitimately audited, and the fake auditors with no experience auditing have already broken chain of custody twice (once with the ballots and once with the voting machines). They've also spewed disprovable bullshit that they had to retract. Factually, it isn't a real audit. It is political theater and an obvious attempt to perpetuate a lie about the election because that's what one party of voters in this country has idiotically bought into. My opinion on the matter is irrelevant.
So you don't personally like the recount, but that doesn't mean it isn't necessary.
It isn't necessary. The election results in Arizona have already, in part, been audited, and there is no evidence of any widespread fraud.
If there is fraud it'll be found and if not then at least we made sure there wasn't any.
We already know there wasn't any widespread fraud, and we are well aware of the Qanon biases of the supposed auditors that may get in the way of getting a fair assessment of the Arizona election.
I'm still not sure why the Democrats would be against making sure the election wasn't rigged.
They've already made sure the election wasn't rigged, and it's not just the Democrats who are against the fake audit in Arizona. The Republican Secretary of State, as well as other notable Arizona Republicans, have called out the fake audit for what it is: a sham and an embarrassment to the Republican Party.
I've also listed all of the major reasons to be against the fake audit in Arizona. You're ignoring them.
The entire voting thing is funny when it comes to Democrats because for some unknown reason they don't want you to have to prove who you are to vote, but then when it comes to purchasing alcohol, tobacco, watching a movie or driving a car they want you to have an ID.
There are already systems in place to mitigate against voter fraud. Voter ID laws are a way to disenfranchise voters who are less likely to vote Republican (urban voters, Black voters, Latinx voters, etc.). We don't even have to argue about the purpose of voter ID laws, because notable Republicans have already said the quiet part out loud: They exist to decrease voter turnout among likely Democratic voters so Republicans win.
When it comes to ID, you tried to list off a bunch of things that already require ID, but many or most voter ID bills exclude the kinds of identification that work for the items you listed. For example, a lot of Republican voter ID bills intentionally exclude college identification because college voters are more likely to vote Democratic, even though a college ID would work for almost everything else you listed. Your example backfired.
It's almost like they want there to be voter fraud\
They don't want there to be fraud, and there's no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
and if any happened in Arizona we'll find out.
There was no widespread fraud in Arizona, and we already know that. We also know that the fake audit happening in Arizona right now isn't an impartial audit, so the results are pretty meaningless either way.
The recount ends soon so in a week or so we should have an answer.
The fake audit was supposed to already be over, and I don't think anybody knows when it's actually going to end. There's talk about it continuing long into the summer, if not past the summer. It's a fishing expedition.
I would like it to be over, even though the results are probably going to be something like "we discovered some irregularities, but we aren't going to tell you what those irregularities were or provide any evidence of irregularities. The former president should still be president." Or, perhaps worse, they will find a handful of instances of fraud and use them as evidence of widespread fraud, even though they wouldn't be evidence of widespread fraud.
It's fine that you don't like it, but you're not the center of the universe
I never said, nor suggested, that I was the center of the universe. I'm not sure why you'd even say that. It's wholly irrelevant to the conversation.
and many voters in Arizona think it's necessary. Are you even a voter in Arizona?
Many voters in Arizona believe in debunked Qanon conspiracy theories, and vaccine microchips, and COVID being a hoax, and the moon-landing not happening, and think the former president should have won the 2020 election, etc. That doesn't mean it's right or should happen. A majority of voters in Arizona, and in the United States, believe Biden should be the president of the United States, and he is.
I already did list another vulnerable group, White people. White people have become the target of organizations such as BLM (see my signature) and the Liberal media. If it's now a crime to speak badly to an Asian person then it also should be a crime to speak badly to a white person.
White people are not a vulnerable population in this country. They're a majority, and they hold most of the power. There's no documented widespread violence against white people.
Violence against a white person on account of that person's race is already a hate crime, so I'm not sure what you want. The anti-Asian hate crime bill did things like make it easier to report hate crimes by including more Asian languages, increasing outreach with information, etc. I'm not sure what you want.
