The first part has nothing to do with God at all. In fact, it has to do with the idea of morality based solely on religion...if there's no religion we'd all be beating each other and raping women that was the claim I was responding to. Morality is not religiously based as many want to claim. If we are going to apply logic and reason to the religious doctrine, we might as well apply it to the religion itself, right. The problem here is that religions blanket themselves in their texts. The Bible/Koran/Torah/etc. says this is true so it must be true.
How do you know he's a infinite being? You've just made that claim of understanding of what or who he is, that he's infinite. How do you know he isn't some weird alien being from galaxy X? This seems to be extremely illogical that you would make a claim of understanding God to say that we can't understand him.
One religion that claims to hold the truth would seem logical, if that religion could bring forth concrete evidence of that claim. No one religion has yet, hence why we have conflicting religions, in fact it's so conflicting, we have different sects within different religions.
