The people saying that some studies say piracy doesn't really hurt sales that much, that MAY be true on other systems:
I personally have bought games on systems where I also have "downloaded backups" on, like buying Steam games on my pc while also having some "downloaded backup games/installers", or buying some apps on the iOS App Store and Google Play Store, while also having "downloaded backup ipa's and apk's" etc.
BUT that's only on other systems. NOT on my Switch.
Simply for one reason alone: bans include denying your console's access to eShop
SURE, there may still be workarounds like eXhop or "update download status", but until when will these work?
So regarding OP: "Nintendo Switch Compromised: Nintendo's View?"
- I think their view is pretty twisted (to the point of being authoritarian), considering they actually PREVENT people from spending any more money when they ban them. It's like they're more focused on staying in control, even if they lose potential profit in the process.
But maybe I'm an edge case... how many other people here use "xci/nsp backups", AND would've still bought games on the eShop if there was never a looming threat of denying you eShop access?
I just had to ask this. What the fuck is a stooge?Very funny but you know that eventually people will rise up against corporations and Nintendo will be included, don't give me that bs, your nothing but a corporate stooge, soon you will see that all corporations will bow down to people. It is already happening and whether you like it or not, Nintendo will pay, corporations don't have all the control, people do.
I just had to ask this. What the fuck is a stooge?
stoogeI just had to ask this. What the fuck is a stooge?
thanksstooge
stuːdʒ/
noun
- 1.
derogatory
a subordinate used by another to do unpleasant routine work.
"party stooges put there to do a job on behalf of central office"
synonyms: underling, minion, lackey, subordinate, assistant; More
- 2.
a performer whose act involves being the butt of a comedian's jokes.
"the stooge is offstage"
synonyms: butt, foil, straight man
"a comedian's stooge"
No, it's not anarchy, all companies need to be controlled and regulated and it's already happening.
u call him a communist just because he said that?Okay mister stalin
u call him a communist just because he said that?
that's too extreme. And yes, companies should and are regulated.. Not all the world has a wild capitalist system
fair, i thought he was talking about the gov..Yeah but they aren't regulated by the common people, that would be anarchy. They are regulated by the GOVERNMENT. That was Yami Anubis ZX's point, that companies should"bow down to the people and be controlled by them". See how unrealistic that sounds?
My relationship with Steam is that I completely stopped pirating games that are available on Steam as long as they don't include additional DRM (like Denuvo); if a game I want to play includes Denuvo, though, I will pirate it without any feeling of guilty, as well as refuse to ever purchase it — regardless of how much I like the game or whether I think the devs deserve being paid for my experience — until Denuvo is removed from it.The people saying that some studies say piracy doesn't really hurt sales that much, that MAY be true on other systems:
I personally have bought games on systems where I also have "downloaded backups" on, like buying Steam games on my pc while also having some "downloaded backup games/installers", or buying some apps on the iOS App Store and Google Play Store, while also having "downloaded backup ipa's and apk's" etc.
I'm in a similar situation. I was always going to hack/crack my Switch, because I don't consider a system I can't hack into worth of owning, but I was planning on purchasing a bunch of first-party Nintendo games: Mario Odyssey, Mario Kart, Breath of the Wild, Smash Bros, Pokemon, and perhaps a couple other games like Splatoon. Between the bans and the need to pay a fee to play online starting next month, though, I gave up on ever owning an original Switch game.BUT that's only on other systems. NOT on my Switch.
Simply for one reason alone: bans include denying your console's access to eShop
SURE, there may still be workarounds like eXhop or "update download status", but until when will these work?
bans include denying your console's access to eShop
SURE, there may still be workarounds like eXhop or "update download status", but until when will these work?
Those methods will ALWAYS work.
Seems to be a ban wave going on, be warned. Also looks like they're upgrading bans from e-shop to full CDN ban.
I'm getting this error 2137-7403 when trying to update my games D: (LEGIT GAMES).
I too was already banned before and I didn't have this message, strange
It seems they are moving from Nintendo Online Services to FULL BAN. They are ridiculous. So basically I cant even update my games now
This is why you shouldn't say a method will ALWAYS work when it can be controlled/disabled from the server-side by Nintendo. Because at that point, it's just hope that they don't go that far... and it seems they are now willing to.
Accessing the server REQUIRES a valid and accepted tls-certificate from the console. If this is banned, nothing will work any more, period. Saying something will ALWAYS work means you have no understanding of how said thing works.
The original bans were dauth loss only and allowed a user to still update games and access firmware updates. With Bob's constant attempts to cheat the system going and the use of public certs, this is the result. If they burn every tls-certificate, you can't have a public certificate left to use... at least not for long.
Nintendo's just doing the next logical thing at this point.
Don't take my posts out of context. The methods i was referring to are the non legit methods of getting game updates and firmware updates. The posts you have quoted are from people who use their OWN PRIVATE CERTS. CDNSP(AKA the method for getting game updates) doesn't, it uses public, donated certs and doesn't even run on the console itself. So as long as those certs keep being donated, the method will keep working.
The approach to just ban tls-certificates directly, rather than banning dauth first, means that they're also burning potential public certificates. If all eShop improper access directly just results in full tls loss, then there won't be public certs after the purging.
As such CDNSP would also no longer work after it runs out of certs, and further attempts to download NSPs or install NSPs results in automatic loss of the tls-certificate rather than first losing dauth.
There is no indication of Nintendo doing that. Of course there is the remote possibility of them doing that in the future but for the time being there is no indication of them taking that route. Maybe, just MAYBE, it's a remote possibility but nothing more than that
Don't take my posts out of context.
Except I didn't even mention that AT ALL.The methods i was referring to are the non legit methods of getting game updates and firmware updates.