Just a thought, that IS how a news post should be done. You actually learn that in school XD
You're also supposed to be neutral, as in having no opinion when you make the gist of an article you're trying to convey.
On being "unbiased"....
First if it is intended as a simplistic "make things passable" routine (think being told never use dissonance in a musical piece- without it chances are you can make it work, with it you might
be great but the potential for failure is higher) then I guess I can go that.
Beyond that though I start seeing logical problems everywhere
To start with we are considering that games, in this case anyway, are worth the time; [insert sentence using words "grand scheme of things"]. This is not such an alien concept and many news outlets have been blasted for being ? centric and there are those that attempt the "will this be relevant 100 years from now" routine for their news. I will leave a discussion on the merits of human animals only wanting immediate local information for another day.
Twisting slightly away I will go to the intellectual property stuff- now confusion of IP types is one thing and a danger but a story along the lines of "look what those backwards pigfuckers in charge of/administering the US IP system did now" would be inherently biased by the definitions that seem to be being floated here. This also leads on to letter of the law vs spirit of the law; what lens do you view it through when that happens. Mix in different values held in different places and it gets worse though I probably already hinted at that.
Spinning back to the relevance thing it also potentially leads to interesting concepts- that a game is due in 5 days and a demo is out is almost unquestionably news but I come back in five years and I am not going to care about the demo as much as the reviews, DLC/expansions/updates and other post match analysis. Taking it back to this topic though we could well be looking at the edge of the cliff for Nintendo (or a massive rebound, or the start of a decade or two of scraping by, or the thing that leads to a buyout, or.....) in which case this would possibly be relevant if I am looking back in a few years.
If we are going for bias as well it probably would even be that tough to make said biased article but with a liberal application of some non sales data (stock prices, credit reports, financial statements....) have it appear as a genuine analysis.
I could go on but either cheesy films or work calls so ending with a relevant video