Sony announces the PlayStation Classic

L-lead-hand-755x425.jpg

Sony is borrowing its best friend Nintendo's idea to bring its classic console in palm format. Meet the PlayStation Classic.



Announced in a blog post today, this miniature rehash of the classic console with a very original name will feature defining titles like Final Fantasy VII, Tekken 3, Wild Arms and 17 other "legendary titles".

L-angle.jpg

20180919_095149.png

"The mini console is approximately 45% smaller than the original PlayStation, and it emulates the original’s look and feel by featuring similar controllers and packaging," reads the blog post.

Each unit will come bundled with an HDMI cable, a USB cable, and two controllers for local multiplayer within compatible titles.

Pre-loaded with 20 classic title, the new mini-console launches December 3 at an MSRP of $99.99.
:arrow: SOURCE
 

CeeDee

fuckin dork
Member
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
5,361
Trophies
3
XP
9,958
Country
United States
But sega have been doing mini consoles long before ninty, so ninty copied them! But nobody cares because it is nintendo, their god and saviour.
You're not wrong. It's nothing new by any means, "plug and play" consoles have been around for eons.

But Sega's were outsourced and of cheap quality. Similar goes for the various Atari models.
Nintendo's handling of their own seems to have been what sparked everyone else to make their own similar, probably higher quality, miniature ROM machines - NES/SNES, Neo Geo, that C64 one, and now the PlayStation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthDub

TJHeartnote

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
133
Trophies
1
XP
865
Country
United States
Who is willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that this thing gets cracked in a month or less. And all you would need is a exturnal Hdd and a OTG adaptor to get all the ps1 games on there plus other systems.
 

GamerzHell9137

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
4,038
Trophies
2
Age
28
XP
3,725
Country
Bosnia and Herzegovina
When a limited emulator costs 100 bucks and they ask you to buy a power cable with it.
*claps* Scalping like Nintendo did with 3DS XL~

Just get a raspberry pi
 

kumikochan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
3,753
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Tongeren
XP
3,311
Country
Belgium
Both of those were started after PlayStation development started.

32x was released around the same time as the PlayStation & there is no way it was in development as long.

Jaguar was released before it worked properly. Sony waited until they could get the price down and launch a working product. Sony did some relatively major last minute changes to the GPU to get the performance up, they dumped the previous revision into the arcade. Where the GPU will only ever run 1 game, rather than screwing over their entire generation of consoles like Atari did. Jack Tramiel used to pull the same shit when he worked at commodore.
Are you kidding me ? Do you even Know how development works ? The jaguar came out a year prior to the PlayStation so ofcourse it was in development way before the playstation. Lmao claims the psx was in development prior to a console that came out way before.
 

Captain_N

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
1,908
Trophies
2
XP
2,047
Country
United States
Id rather own a ps1 and burn cd's if i wanted to play games i dont own. Every ps1 can boot a burn with the disc swap trick.
Cool for collectors i suppose.
Wouldn't ib be kick ass if it actually read cds?
Those ps1 games are gonna look like shit on a 1080p/4k tv. early 3d games dont age well. When played on a modern display its even worse. They better add good crt emulation. The crt rounds out all the sharp edges and smooths the pixelated sprites.
 

Kioku

猫。子猫です!
Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Messages
12,018
Trophies
3
Location
In the Murderbox!
Website
www.twitch.tv
XP
16,180
Country
United States
Id rather own a ps1 and burn cd's if i wanted to play games i dont own. Every ps1 can boot a burn with the disc swap trick.
Cool for collectors i suppose.
Wouldn't ib be kick ass if it actually read cds?
Those ps1 games are gonna look like shit on a 1080p/4k tv. early 3d games dont age well. When played on a modern display its even worse. They better add good crt emulation. The crt rounds out all the sharp edges and smooths the pixelated sprites.
Disc swapping is tedious and I despise CD lenses. At that point you may as well just emulate.
 

Captain_N

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
1,908
Trophies
2
XP
2,047
Country
United States
Disc swapping is tedious and I despise CD lenses. At that point you may as well just emulate.
Yeah cd lasers do suck. I tend to have multiples of my consoles for that reason. My original gamecube laser is gone. glad i had 4 gamecubes lol. Long live carts lol
 

tranceology3

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
92
Trophies
0
Age
43
XP
846
Country
United States
It is cool that console makers are bringing back classic systems with installed games - a very simple way to bring back retro gaming. However, why won't any console maker just take it to the next level and release hardware that is capable of emulating their games like PC emulators do, with super nice anti-aliasing, shaders, all the enhancements, etc. I am not an expert with emulators, but since these companies designed the systems from scratch, don't they have way more resources to work with to optimize a kick ass emulator? Then why not just resell some of these games as emulated remastered for $20. Once the emulator is done, they can just resell their whole library again. I mean technically they are already emulating them in these classic systems, but at their normal resolution - which is fine for people that want the classic look, but it would be interesting to see how well an upgraded licensed emulator would do on the market. Those PS1 games are just so damn painful on the eyes, especially on an HDTV, playing on a 480i CRT back in the 90s wasn't that noticeable though.
 

Hanafuda

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
4,527
Trophies
2
XP
7,031
Country
United States
Are you kidding me ? Do you even Know how development works ? The jaguar came out a year prior to the PlayStation so ofcourse it was in development way before the playstation. Lmao claims the psx was in development prior to a console that came out way before.


If you include the time Sony and Nintendo spent developing the Play Station / SNES-CD together, then development of the Playstation began in 1986. When Nintendo cancelled the deal Sony had a lot of the work done, but had to redesign as an independent product completely separate from SNES architecture. Technically, you're both correct, depending on how you want to look at it.
 

smf

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
6,651
Trophies
2
XP
5,908
Country
United Kingdom
Are you kidding me ? Do you even Know how development works ? The jaguar came out a year prior to the PlayStation so ofcourse it was in development way before the playstation. Lmao claims the psx was in development prior to a console that came out way before.

We know that the CPU in the 360 was a result of a design Sony asked IBM to build for the PS3 & yet the 360 came out a year before the PS3.

Either your logic doesn't hold up, or Microsoft had a time machine.
 
Last edited by smf,

sarkwalvein

There's hope for a Xenosaga port.
Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
8,519
Trophies
2
Age
41
Location
Niedersachsen
XP
11,275
Country
Germany
I know how development works, your conclusion is provably flawed.

We know the PS3 started development before the Xbox 360, because Microsoft went to IBM and asked for the same CPU they were developing for Sony (in cooperation with Toshiba and Sony).

The 360 came out a year before the PS3.

By your argument Microsoft must have been developing the 360 for an entire year before Sony started the PS3. Obviously they just sat there doing nothing for 12 months.
I don't think SONY introduced 3D to consoles, but they made it to be the main focus on consoles.
(i.e. some way of 3D graphics was already there somewhat barebone in some Sega Genesis games, but it never was the focal point of the console)

Anyway, it was coming, if SONY hadn't made it the main focus, it would have been Nintendo, they were into talks with SGI about it since 1992 IIRC.
So probably Nintendo was the one that started developing the "first console fully focused on 3D"... Or better said it wasn't Nintendo, it was SGI, and it wanted to sell the concept to either SEGA or NINTENDO back then.

You can easily see that the 32X is a desperate move and more than an afterthought, and SEGA with the Saturn wasn't really thinking of 3D as the main mode of operation for the console, powering it up for 3D was also kind of an afterthought after getting to know what SONY was planning to put out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KiiWii

smf

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
6,651
Trophies
2
XP
5,908
Country
United Kingdom
I don't think SONY introduced 3D to consoles, but they made it to be the main focus on consoles.
(i.e. some way of 3D graphics was already there somewhat barebone in some Sega Genesis games, but it never was the focal point of the console)

3d in games goes back earlier than the megadrive, but it was mostly software driven.

Sony were already working on 3d for their real time video effects system called System G. It's not as famous as the systems from Quantel and doesn't seem to have made it out of Japan.

If anything 3do/jaguar & playstation were all conceived independently around the same time in 1991. It's just that 3do & jaguar rushed to market with more expensive or broken products.

it would have been Nintendo, they were into talks with SGI about it since 1992 IIRC.

1993, SGI had tried to sell it to Sega but they were already working on Saturn. Nintendo didn't have anything and so they jumped at it.

You can easily see that the 32X is a desperate move and more than an afterthought, and SEGA with the Saturn wasn't really thinking of 3D as the main mode of operation for the console, powering it up for 3D was also kind of an afterthought after getting to know what SONY was planning to put out.

Sega have also publicly stated that the Saturn wasn't designed for 3d.
 

WildDog

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
188
Trophies
0
Age
37
XP
271
Country
Netherlands
When a limited emulator costs 100 bucks and they ask you to buy a power cable with it.
*claps* Scalping like Nintendo did with 3DS XL~

Just get a raspberry pi
The thing is that limited emulator most likely will be hacked to play more games or even other system.. Take a look at the Nintendo minis.
Down the road a Pi3b or Plus are more expensive, once you build the thing to play games... Plus if you play for a long time, you will get the red temperature icon... UNLESS you get a heatsink and a fan (plus the case that supports them), so more $$$$$
 

kumikochan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
3,753
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Tongeren
XP
3,311
Country
Belgium
We know that the CPU in the 360 was a result of a design Sony asked IBM to build for the PS3 & yet the 360 came out a year before the PS3.

Either your logic doesn't hold up, or Microsoft had a time machine.
It's not about Microsoft tho. Your logic that Sony came out with 3D first is bullshit logic since there have been consoles before that did it. Even the Commodore 128 did it wich was considered the same as a console in Europe. The jaguar did it before, the 32X did it before. Even the Vectrex did it before and was considered 3D. If you're talking about polygon 3d then the Jaguar did it before and so did the 32x. Let me use your own shitty logic against you. Philips was working aside Sony with Nintendo but the CD-I came out in 1991 so they were even WAAAAAAAAAAAY before the PlayStation. Even the 3DO was a year prior to the PlayStation and was in development for a long time. No your statement that the playstation was first is bullshit, sorry to break it to you
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    They probably said "Hey, why not we combine the two together and make a 'new' DS to sell".
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's a DS Lite in a slightly bigger DS Lite shell.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's not a Nintendo / iQue official product, it's a 3rd party custom.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Nothing special about it other than it's more comfortable than the Lite
    for people with beefy hands.
    +1
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    I have yaoi anime hands, very lorge but slender.
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    I'm Slenderman.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    I have hands.
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    imagine not having hands, cringe
    +1
  • AncientBoi @ AncientBoi:
    ESPECIALLY for things I do to myself :sad:.. :tpi::rofl2: Or others :shy::blush::evil:
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    @SylverReZ if you could find a v5 DS ML you would have the best of both worlds since the v5 units had the same backlight brightness levels as the DS Lite unlockable with flashme
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    but that's a long shot
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i think only the red mario kart edition phat was v5
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    A woman with no arms and no legs was sitting on a beach. A man comes along and the woman says, "I've never been hugged before." So the man feels bad and hugs her. She says "Well i've also never been kissed before." So he gives her a kiss on the cheek. She says "Well I've also never been fucked before." So the man picks her up, and throws her in the ocean and says "Now you're fucked."
    +2
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    lmao
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    anyways, we need to re-normalize physical media

    if i didn't want my games to be permanent, then i'd rent them
    +1
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Agreed, that why I try to buy all my games on disc, Xbox anyways. Switch games (which I pirate tbh) don't matter much, I stay offline 24/7 anyways.
  • AncientBoi @ AncientBoi:
    I don't pirate them, I Use Them :mellow:. Like I do @BigOnYa 's couch :tpi::evil::rofl2:
    +1
  • cearp @ cearp:
    @BakerMan - you can still "own" digital media, arguably easier and better than physical since you can make copies and backups, as much as you like.

    The issue is DRM
  • cearp @ cearp:
    You can buy drm free games / music / ebooks, and if you keep backups of your data (like documents and family photos etc), then you shouldn't lose the game. but with a disk, your toddler could put it in the toaster and there goes your $60

    :rofl2:
  • cearp @ cearp:
    still, I agree physical media is nice to have. just pointing out the issue is drm
  • rqkaiju2 @ rqkaiju2:
    i like physical media because it actually feels like you own it. thats why i plan on burning music to cds
  • cearp @ cearp:
    It's nice to not have to have a lot of physical things though, saves space
    +1
  • AncientBoi @ AncientBoi:
    Nor clothes 🤮 . Saves on time, soap, water and money having to wash them. :D
    AncientBoi @ AncientBoi: Nor clothes 🤮 . Saves on time, soap, water and money having to wash them. :D