Oh OK thanks for enlightenment. Still pretty bad situation though. I hate that kind of thinking where adults can't choose what to buy for entertainment just because of "why won't anyone think about the children?!?"
AND that won't change my toughts that devs alter the game because of germany. Why else they would?
It's $60 for a full fledged RPG game, stop bitching about it Christ.
This isn't some little shit downloadable title, this is a big RPG made by a big RPG developer released as a full console game. Please realize this and stop crying.
Mary Whitehouse is masturbating furiously in her grave with glee
O-oh course hun, I'll, umm... purchase this video game as I do with every single one we play, and I will purchase it new to support the studio and the developers... Yes... *Whistles nonchalantly*Foxi, do your magic. I want to play the uncut version so I can complain about my bleeding eyes later!! X3
I would gladly pay $60 for a good game and if I don't have that much, I can always get it pre-owned. I don't think that's a terribly over-the-top price, most contemporary games sell for prices in that ballpark. I don't see a reason why PC gamers should get the exact same game cheaper, no reasons at all, maybe except for the sense of self-entitlement and the marginal royalties costs (which Steam no doubt has as well).*$10 makes a difference*
O-oh course hun, I'll, umm... purchase this video game as I do with every single one we play, and I will purchase it new to support the studio and the developers... Yes... *Whistles nonchalantly*
I would gladly pay $60 for a good game and if I don't have that much, I can always get it pre-owned. I don't think that's a terribly over-the-top price, most contemporary games sell for prices in that ballpark. I don't see a reason why PC gamers should get the exact same game cheaper, no reasons at all, maybe except for the sense of self-entitlement and the marginal royalties costs (which Steam no doubt has as well).
My only problem with this release is that it's missing content, ergo I'll have to look for *cough cough* "workarounds".
I agree with you, digitally distributed games should be cheaper, but that doesn't concern PC only.It's quite simple really. Console games are more expensive because most are physically manufactured, which costs enough to make a difference. The price is increased to compensate for the costs of all that. The only time I actually see physical copies of PC games is when they're triple A games these days, and hell still most of them only cost the norm of $50. Pretty much no PC gamers buy physical copies anymore unless it's for collection purposes. Console gamers are, I suppose, getting away from it but there's still a huge sector for physical copies.
And just to note, i'm not really being 'cheap'. $60 is a pittance I can impulse spend in a second, but that doesn't change the fact I refuse to support producers that are attempting to raise the price of the average PC game.
They did the same for Fallout 3. That had real name drugs and they have to rename them all. I dont have a clue which does what now but if they had the real names I would know what to take and what to miss.Australia is like a different dimension - they ban games for the dumbest of reasons. I mean, they banned "State of Decay" because of... use of medicine, including methadone, amphetamine, aspirin, ibuprofen and other real-life drugs. Microsoft has to swap the names of drugs for imaginary ones in case the poor gamers get stupid ideas when playing the game... that's going to be rated for mature audiences anyways because it features shooting zombies.
Real-life drugs in Fallout 3? You sure you got that right? I'm pretty sure that they used all the original, iconic names like Stimpak, Buffout, Mentats, Psycho etc., I've never heard of a Fallout game using actual names of drugs, unless it was a story element I overlooked or something.They did the same for Fallout 3. That had real name drugs and they have to rename them all. I dont have a clue which does what now but if they had the real names I would know what to take and what to miss.
It now makes the games more confusing. Thanks for nothing you moronic censors.
I feel like getting rid of the Jews on account of the Germans would be counter productive in trying to leave the past behind...If they had cut out the Jew class, then it would have been most likely because of us.
You're right. There's no "Meth", "Cocaine", etc. The only real drugs are alcohol and cigarettes.Real-life drugs in Fallout 3? You sure you got that right? I'm pretty sure that they used all the original, iconic names like Stimpak, Buff-out, Mentats, Psycho etc., I've never heard of a Fallout game using actual names of drugs, unless it was a story element I overlooked or something.
That's a totally understandable viewpoint. That's not the point, though. You're saying the quality of the game is dependent upon its retail price, even when pirating. And that makes no fucking sense whatsoever. You said you refuse to support producers who're trying to raise PC prices, but you're not supporting anyone, except possibly the torrent site/other site you pirate from through ad revenue.It's quite simple really. Console games are more expensive because most are physically manufactured, which costs enough to make a difference. The price is increased to compensate for the costs of all that. The only time I actually see physical copies of PC games is when they're triple A games these days, and hell still most of them only cost the norm of $50. Pretty much no PC gamers buy physical copies anymore unless it's for collection purposes. Console gamers are, I suppose, getting away from it but there's still a huge sector for physical copies.
And just to note, i'm not really being 'cheap'. $60 is a pittance I can impulse spend in a second, but that doesn't change the fact I refuse to support producers that are attempting to raise the price of the average PC game.
It's quite simple really. Console games are more expensive because most are physically manufactured, which costs enough to make a difference. The price is increased to compensate for the costs of all that. The only time I actually see physical copies of PC games is when they're triple A games these days, and hell still most of them only cost the norm of $50. Pretty much no PC gamers buy physical copies anymore unless it's for collection purposes. Console gamers are, I suppose, getting away from it but there's still a huge sector for physical copies.
And just to note, i'm not really being 'cheap'. $60 is a pittance I can impulse spend in a second, but that doesn't change the fact I refuse to support producers that are attempting to raise the price of the average PC game.
You know why there are no real drugs in Fallout 3? Its becuase they banned it with the real drug names and have to redo it. That was before it was released.Real-life drugs in Fallout 3? You sure you got that right? I'm pretty sure that they used all the original, iconic names like Stimpak, Buffout, Mentats, Psycho etc., I've never heard of a Fallout game using actual names of drugs, unless it was a story element I overlooked or something.
No one is complaining about the console price (not I at least, console peasants can pay what they want).
So, why is Thief $50? That's quite a high fidelity game and yet it's only $50 on PC. Just because this is an RPG doesn't incur an extra $10 over the PC norm. $60 is a greedy price on the PC and it's only certain publishers (Craptivision, EA, Ubisoft) that actively push it while the better ones stick around the PC norm.
Because console gamers have never complained that a game is $5 more than the usual game prices, ever, that has never happened before amirite.The level of entitlement of PC gamers is fucking mindboggling.
The level of entitlement of PC gamers is fucking mindboggling.
$10 is not a big difference, if you want to pay less for it than wait until the price drops or it goes on sale.
Funny? Sure. Just as funny? Iuno. Those scenes where people crap their pants when they die are funnier than the text saying they are crapping their pants.