You're a fool because you fail to understand how things are and how they will influence the lives of your children in the future. You'd rather cling to the things that have failed us to this point than try something different, and you desperately search for strawmen (or women, in this case. As an aside, the woman in the breitbart video never said she had abortions for spite or without cause, just that the gentleman standing opposite her and her fellow protesters has no right to determine how her body should be managed. If the majority of people are good, how can you be so certain she falls in that dreaded 6% you talked about from a 2 minute clip?) to validate your choice to abandon responsibility and change from what you saw as broken.
If you think you've got something better than communism, by all means, make your case. Your posts in my other thread did show you aren't very contented with things either, yet you just are afraid (like a coward, see?) of anything that disrupts your tiny bubble. I feel bad for your kids.
Take the red pill. We will rise up on truth social, and uphold the constitution by attacking the government. We will find joy in the suffering of others because we are the party of love and brotherhood... that means no girls allowed unless they put out before and after making dinner. Gotta love boomer mentality.
Did you just presume my response and not read my words? I drive safe and don't run over people, so... nobody dies? I really don't see what kinda gotcha you're going for, but it missed. You're really bad at this. I hope you aren't murdering folk behind the wheel while screaming "it's the same as an abortion!"
Cute. Thanks for confirming my above suspicion. I'll just share a couple of bullet points as to why you're floundering here.
1. The link, which again is for a known statistical outlier of Florida due to their having a number of clinics that drew tourists to them prior to attacks against human rights, shows that YOUR numbers are just wrong. Still not going to bring that up, nor share where your graph came from? It certainly wasn't the Florida AHCA, where it says the numbers came from. Also, considering the heavy political leaning against the AHCA, I would hesitate to use those numbers myself without some serious digging to begin with, but I actually care about how data is being gathered more than if it supports my arguments immediately.
2. Elective does not mean without reason. Honestly, I don't care if the reason was a perverse desire to have a trained professional play rotor rooter in someone's innards, as I wholeheartedly believe it isn't anyone else's business, but I'll keep walking with you a while. Elective means that it wasn't a medical requirement and that there was not a reason given as to why it was deemed necessary by the woman. I can promise you that a majority had plenty of good reasons to not go through with bringing a life into the world yet, but those studies draw a lot of ire due to the stigma around abortions in this country and that state in particular, so they tend to clam up. I thought you knew how to read data, as a professional med school grad and all.
3. Your double post to the same reply of two sentences kinda gives the game away. You're grasping because you're just an act. You're a fraud and a liar, and nobody is buying your med school claims or "data" from a pdf from liveaction.org or wherever, especially when it contradicts your own statement and the numbers from the source it claims to have pulled from. Give it up, kid, you've got nothing to contribute and you're just digging yourself deeper.
K3Nv2
Xdqwerty
BigOnYa
