Unpopular Opinions Time

[Seliph]

It seems all of your arguments rely upon the lie in your signature that you pretend is fact, that gender doesn't exist. If that was true, natural selection would never have created different sexes in the first place and everyone would reproduce asexually like some type of lower organism like an amoeba.

To anyone above a caveman level of education, your arguments are easily spotted as lies. Things like natural selection and evolution would also be required to not exist for the stuff you type to be true. How stupid do you think people are that anyone would fall for such obvious lies? You might be able to fool a 10 year old child or lower maybe, but not an actual adult.

Since different sexes in reality do exist - contrary to your lies - that implies a specialization of labor and defacto non-equality. Where exactly in Darwin's Origin of Species did you read that natural selection creates equality in the first place? Why are you spamming the forum with obvious lies?

You were unable to address my argument about a woman with a gun I see

 

[r0achtheunsavory]

You were unable to address my argument about a woman with a gun I see

It's a bogus, Marxist argument that assumes equality by default. Even if you assume manual dexterity affecting things like guns is identical (turns out it's not, men test higher in spatial fields which would likely have an affect while women test higher in things like linguistics), there's a million other externalities for who wins in a contest of force or war beside simply the ability to pick up a gun.

Since nature created different sexes which implies defacto specialization of labor and non-equality, by the time you pick up a gun thinking you're going to "defeat the patriarchy", that weapon could already be superceded by a new invention. What percent of military industrial complex inventors and workers do you think are male vs female?

Men evolved to do things like hunt and go to war and women didn't. It's called specialization of labor. And those traits would play out in any modern day context. Some random outliers are meaningless and don't count for anything. Only the bell curve matters.

Why do men test better in these spatial testings? Because men who tested poorly in them would be bad at throwing a spear at a deer or whatever and would starve and die. It's simple natural selection.

Why do women test better at linguistics? Because linguistics is basically just the art of trying to deceive or manipulate people into getting them to do something to acquire resources without force. Women lacked at force so became better at deception.

 

[Cryoraptor]

I'm just gonna sit back and watch the chaos unfold

 

[sarkwalvein]

I'm just gonna sit back and watch the chaos unfold

I don't enjoy this type of BS to be honest.
I will just leave it be, nothing good will come out of trying to discuss with some fanatic that seems to monologue his fantasies around and avoid replying to any point in the posts he quotes. That is no discussion, no conversation, it's just a mad man monologuing his fantasies out.

 

[Seliph]

It's a bogus, Marxist argument that assumes equality by default. Even if you assume manual dexterity affecting things like guns is identical (turns out it's not, men test higher in spatial fields which would likely have an affect while women test higher in things like linguistics), there's a million other externalities for who wins in a contest of force or war beside simply the ability to pick up a gun.

Since nature created different sexes which implies defacto specialization of labor and non-equality, by the time you pick up a gun thinking you're going to "defeat the patriarchy", that weapon could already be superceded by a new invention. What percent of military industrial complex inventors and workers do you think are male vs female?

Men evolved to do things like hunt and go to war and women didn't. It's called specialization of labor. And those traits would play out in any modern day context. Some random outliers are meaningless and don't count for anything. Only the bell curve matters.

I don't think everyone is equal nor am I a Marxist. I'm just saying a woman with a gun could definitely beat a man without a gun which disproves that men are inherently superior in force. Any woman can wield any weapon and any man can wield any weapon. Muscle mass differences between men and women mean nothing when technology is taken into consideration. Your ideas are antiquated and make no sense in the modern world. We're not hunter-gatherers anymore, we live in a world where technology can bridge any gap in equality, you just hold onto weirdo patriarchal ideas of the past because it makes you feel more self-important than you actually are.

 

[0x3000027E]

I will just leave it be

Then does not leave it be...

 

[KingBlank]

Megaman Battle Network is better than the classic series. The Wii U currently has a better 1st party library than The Switch. Bethesda is an absolute trash company and harmful to gaming as a whole.

Dude, you are speaking my language - I agree on all points. Not sure if the MMBN being better than the classic series counts as unpopular, I think Battle Network is capcoms best selling Mega Man series.

 

[RichardTheKing]

Where I live, the water is hard as fuck and tastes like chalk sometimes, so bottled water can make pure water drinkable for those who live in areas of hard water.

They don't sell filters or purifiers or anything, where you live? That's...quite unfortunate, actually.

<Insert insensitive joke about "hard water = ice" and "you should melt it first" here>

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Megaman Battle Network is better than the classic series. The Wii U currently has a better 1st party library than The Switch. Bethesda is an absolute trash company and harmful to gaming as a whole.

The Wii U still has exclusive access to Twilight Princess HD, The Wind Waker HD, DS Virtual Console, and I guess Xenoblade X. Also backwards-compatible with Wii games, though only around three are actually enjoyable due to barely using the dysfunctional motion controls - Super Paper Mario, Twilight Princess Wii, and Super Smash Bros. Brawl.

So yep, there's still reason to love the unfortunately-named-and-marketed console.

 

[Megadriver94]

It's a bogus, Marxist argument that assumes equality by default. Even if you assume manual dexterity affecting things like guns is identical (turns out it's not, men test higher in spatial fields which would likely have an affect while women test higher in things like linguistics), there's a million other externalities for who wins in a contest of force or war beside simply the ability to pick up a gun.

Since nature created different sexes which implies defacto specialization of labor and non-equality, by the time you pick up a gun thinking you're going to "defeat the patriarchy", that weapon could already be superceded by a new invention. What percent of military industrial complex inventors and workers do you think are male vs female?

Men evolved to do things like hunt and go to war and women didn't. It's called specialization of labor. And those traits would play out in any modern day context. Some random outliers are meaningless and don't count for anything. Only the bell curve matters.

Why do men test better in these spatial testings? Because men who tested poorly in them would be bad at throwing a spear at a deer or whatever and would starve and die. It's simple natural selection.

Why do women test better at linguistics? Because linguistics is basically just the art of trying to deceive or manipulate people into getting them to do something to acquire resources without force. Women lacked at force so became better at deception.

I get at what you are saying for the most part. Men and Women do have differences beyond just the privates, for sure. However, civilization is not 100% done by males on their own. Also, the roles of men and women have always, even now differ by culture, some, like those in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia, and many areas of Pakistan and still in certain parts of India, are highly patriarchal in one way or another, and in most cases the choices of adult females outside the house is limited and have a status that is like that of, or slightly above, a child's status. Others, like a number of Amerindian tribes (especially pre-Columbus) and some peoples in Sub-Saharan Africa, The Hmong of South China, Vietnam, Loas, and Thailand, as well as in Polynesia, are less rigid in terms of women freely going outside the home.

 

[RichardTheKing]

I get at what you are saying for the most part. Men and Women do have differences beyond just the privates, for sure. However, civilization is not 100% done by males on their own. Also, the roles of men and women have always, even now differ by culture, some, like those in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia, and many areas of Pakistan and still in certain parts of India, are highly patriarchal in one way or another, and in most cases the choices of adult females outside the house is limited and have a status that is like that of, or slightly above, a child's status. Others, like a number of Amerindian tribes (especially pre-Columbus) and some peoples in Sub-Saharan Africa, The Hmong of South China, Vietnam, Loas, and Thailand, as well as in Polynesia, are less rigid in terms of women freely going outside the home.

Do we have any right to criticise or try to change another country's culture, though? Sure, how they treat women might seem horrid to us Westerners, but that doesn't mean we should go in there and forcibly alter their culture.
You know what trying to do that causes? War - where no-one wins.

 

[Ericzander]

Do we have any right to criticise or try to change another country's culture, though? Sure, how they treat women might seem horrid to us Westerners, but that doesn't mean we should go in there and forcibly alter their culture.
You know what trying to do that causes? War - where no-one wins.

What a garbage opinion. Well, I guess this is the thread to share it. Yes, we can and should criticise oppression at every opportunity.

That said, judging by your typical comments I don't buy that you actually think that women are treated unfairly around the world. You seem to have more of a "women are inferior to men and men are being oppressed by feminism" mentality. You don't do a very good job of masking your hatred of women, my guy.

So much so that you RAGE at the idea that you can play as "violent bitches" in videogames when, in your ill-informed opinion, women should only be involved when it deals with women problems "like anxiety girls face when growing up, blood, etc."

I've hinted at this to you before but I'm actually a little worried about your mental health. Take care of yourself.

 

[Julie_Pilgrim]

Pls for the love of god don’t tell stealphie I said this, but I think professor Layton is better than ace attorney

 

[gregory-samba]

There are biological differences between men and women. Though, if a women works hard enough at something she can obtain psychical strength on par with a man, but women usually aren't born with the bigger stronger bones that men are born with. Pointing out differences between the two sexes isn't sexist or doesn't mean you hate women, it just means you live in reality and not some fantasy world. I'm also talking real biological men and biological women and not the type that thinks they are the opposite sex.

 

[Megadriver94]

What a garbage opinion. Well, I guess this is the thread to share it. Yes, we can and should criticise oppression at every opportunity.

That said, judging by your typical comments I don't buy that you actually think that women are treated unfairly around the world. You seem to have more of a "women are inferior to men and men are being oppressed by feminism" mentality. You don't do a very good job of masking your hatred of women, my guy.

So much so that you RAGE at the idea that you can play as "violent bitches" in videogames when, in your ill-informed opinion, women should only be involved when it deals with women problems "like anxiety girls face when growing up, blood, etc."

I've hinted at this to you before but I'm actually a little worried about your mental health. Take care of yourself.

>everything I don't like is oppression!
Sure thing, Ericzander, dear Mr. Woke, go on ahead and keeps sneering at those who are even so much as slightly critical of feminism regardless of the context. I am not a hater of women simply for being alive nor is user RichardtheKing, soylent dumbfuck. Fuckheads like you and Lilith are livid about western police brutality against the "oppressed", such as with the BLM crowd, and ""cultural appropriation"", yet don't give a single FUCK about Hong Kong losing its freedom, nor the Uighurs or Tibetans being culturally repressed and suppressed by Red China, and how the majority of the people living in Cuba are being treated by the government for any mere word or writing of dissent. Ditto for how both Red China and Cuba heavily censor the internet, and the shit that the people of the West Bank and especially Gaza Strip have to go through by the Israelis. EXAMPLES: Phosphorous bombing, blockades and trade restrictions.

 

[RyRyIV]

What a garbage opinion. Well, I guess this is the thread to share it. Yes, we can and should criticise oppression at every opportunity.

That said, judging by your typical comments I don't buy that you actually think that women are treated unfairly around the world. You seem to have more of a "women are inferior to men and men are being oppressed by feminism" mentality. You don't do a very good job of masking your hatred of women, my guy.

So much so that you RAGE at the idea that you can play as "violent bitches" in videogames when, in your ill-informed opinion, women should only be involved when it deals with women problems "like anxiety girls face when growing up, blood, etc."

I've hinted at this to you before but I'm actually a little worried about your mental health. Take care of yourself.

ok Mr. Woke

 

[r0achtheunsavory]

and in most cases the choices of adult females outside the house is limited and have a status that is like that of, or slightly above, a child's status.

That's because:

"What has been will be again, and what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.Is there a case where one can say, “Look, this is new”? It has already existed in the ages before us"

These cultures have already experienced when weak men simp and undeservedly put women up on a pedestal. It turned out badly. Due to the specialization of labor inherit in there being two sexes, women are biologically wired to believe the male is supposed to provide them with free resources. Hence why they think men should pay for dinner, house, wedding, wedding ring, car, and everything else.

In days of the caveman, this wasn't a big deal. You needed to go out and hunt for yourself anyway. If you go kill a deer, there would be leftovers anyway, so you could feed the wife without a huge amount of extra effort. The female then does other tasks while you're busy. Standard division of labor.

This is NOT how modern civilization functions. These suburban, iphone zombie women are the main arbiters of the keeping up with the Jones mentality. They want the male to provide them with a new fancy car, giant house they don't need, constant vacations, diamond rings, etc.

As you can see, interacting with women in the caveman days wasn't entirely a negative for men, but now it's just a giant burden. Modern women essentially want to enslave a man into being a "salary man" indentured servant. In modern marriage, you're willingly throwing away your freedom for no reason to become a slave. There's no such thing as men 'exploiting' women whatsoever in the modern age, it's entirely women exploiting weak and stupid men that don't understand the paradigm at play.

If men refuse to marry because they have no desire to be slaves, the women simply lobby for the government to be their provider in some type of socialist dystopia that eventually collapses with millions of people dying. This is why these countries don't allow women to do things like vote. Women are inherently, biologically, resource extractors. The second you allow them to vote, you are 100% guaranteed to have communism and eventual total collapse:

 

[Ericzander]

>everything I don't like is oppression!
Sure thing, Ericzander, dear Mr. Woke, go on ahead and keeps sneering at those who are even so much as slightly critical of feminism regardless of the context. I am not a hater of women simply for being alive nor is user RichardtheKing, soylent dumbfuck. Fuckheads like you and Lilith are livid about western police brutality against the "oppressed", such as with the BLM crowd, and ""cultural appropriation"", yet don't give a single FUCK about Hong Kong losing its freedom, nor the Uighurs or Tibetans being culturally repressed and suppressed by Red China, and how the majority of the people living in Cuba are being treated by the government for any mere word or writing of dissent. Ditto for how both Red China and Cuba heavily censor the internet, and the shit that the people of the West Bank and especially Gaza Strip have to go through by the Israelis. EXAMPLES: Phosphorous bombing, blockades and trade restrictions.

Yep. That's totally what I am. *I'm* the one jumping to conclusions.

From my comment you've accurately surmised that I think you're a hater of women just because you're alive and that I don't care about Hong Kong or the Uighurs, or how people in Cuba are treated, or the Palestinians.

Wait... What's that? Hold on. As it turns out I DO care about all of those things. Strange. Turns out I'm super critical of China, Cuba, and Israel. But nah, maybe your conclusions about what I really think are correct and I'm just a soylent dumbfuck.

After all, when I said "we can and should criticise oppression at every opportunity" I clearly meant that I don't care about oppression.

 

[Cryoraptor]

That's because:

"What has been will be again, and what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.Is there a case where one can say, “Look, this is new”? It has already existed in the ages before us"

These cultures have already experienced when weak men simp and undeservedly put women up on a pedestal. It turned out badly. Due to the specialization of labor inherit in there being two sexes, women are biologically wired to believe the male is supposed to provide them with free resources. Hence why they think men should pay for dinner, house, wedding, wedding ring, car, and everything else.

In days of the caveman, this wasn't a big deal. You needed to go out and hunt for yourself anyway. If you go kill a deer, there would be leftovers anyway, so you could feed the wife without a huge amount of extra effort. The female then does other tasks while you're busy. Standard division of labor.

This is NOT how modern civilization functions. These suburban, iphone zombie women are the main arbiters of the keeping up with the Jones mentality. They want the male to provide them with a new fancy car, giant house they don't need, constant vacations, diamond rings, etc.

As you can see, interacting with women in the caveman days wasn't entirely a negative for men, but now it's just a giant burden. Modern women essentially want to enslave a man into being a "salary man" indentured servant. In modern marriage, you're willingly throwing away your freedom for no reason to become a slave. There's no such thing as men 'exploiting' women whatsoever in the modern age, it's entirely women exploiting weak and stupid men that don't understand the paradigm at play.

If men refuse to marry because they have no desire to be slaves, the women simply lobby for the government to be their provider in some type of socialist dystopia that eventually collapses with millions of people dying. This is why these countries don't allow women to do things like vote. Women are inherently, biologically, resource extractors. The second you allow them to vote, you are 100% guaranteed to have communism and eventual total collapse:

What's the solution to all this then?

 

[Julie_Pilgrim]

Fan games aren’t as amazing as everyone says they are(some are though, like some sonic fan games, such as sonic robo blast 2)

 

[Cryoraptor]

Fan games aren’t as amazing as everyone says they are

99% are trash, 1% are amazing and better than OG games