That wasn't a moral law. That was a law placed to separate people from high priests, and doesn't apply now.You specifically said those laws still apply.
That wasn't a moral law. That was a law placed to separate people from high priests, and doesn't apply now.You specifically said those laws still apply.
That wasn't a moral law. That was a law placed to separate people from high priests, and doesn't apply now.
The law was in place so that people wouldn't practice the same methods as high priests... it's quite difficult to explain without offending anyone.And this is why most people see Christians as hypocritical assholes.
You can't say "Oh.. This law applies... but that one doesn't... Even though they are literally in the same book right next to each other! Our god is a God of LOVE AND PEACE!!! Please ignore the fact he told soldiers to bash children against rocks and rip the wombs from women.... BUT DON'T YOU DARE ABORT! LOVE AND PIECE! Lets also forget that he was a complete dick with the tower of babel.. LOVE AND PEACE!"
And may I also remind you that Jesus basically said "Shut your trap about your religion it's between you and god and no one else!"
Yet 98 percent of Christians can't abide that either.
Same place you do.. The bible. In fact I can name the book and verses for the ripping wombs from women, and the fiber and homosexuality in the Old testament, and Jesus saying to keep your trap shut in the new testament. Can you give me book and verse in the new testament about homosexuality being a sin?The law was in place so that people wouldn't practice the same methods as high priests... it's quite difficult to explain without offending anyone.
There are verses in the New Testament, today's law, about being homosexual and this is why it is not practiced among Christians. It is also referenced in the Old Testament, and that is why people are getting confused and angry.
I'm sorry. This is a very complicated and difficult topic to cover, and I understand your feeling. i'm sorry.
Also, I don't remember anything about the rocks and the ripping wombs from women, and He stopped the Tower of Babel because man was trying to reach Heaven for self pride. Where are you getting your information?
Again, feel free to read the Creation story again, it never says the Serpent was either Satan or Lucifer.In the Bible, God created the Earth, and man in his own image. He intended for man to live forever, and created the Garden of Eden to house them. He created Eve to accompany Adam, and gave them free will, stating that the only thing they couldn't do was eat from the Tree Of The Knowledge of Good and Evil. Eve was looking at the Tree one day, when Satan, in the form of a snake (In Christianity, there is only one God, Satan was a fallen angel). He tempted Eve and lied to her, in order to get her to take a bite. She did, and in turn gave it to Adam, who took a bite as well. At this point, God saw what they had done and was angry. He cursed the two, banishing them from the garden for listening to Satan. Satan received eternal punishment as well, but it was too late. Sin had already entered the world.
That's the story of the Beginning in my own words, referenced from the NIV Bible.
What version of the Bible are you getting this from?Again, feel free to read the Creation story again, it never says the Serpent was either Satan or Lucifer.
Plus you'll find Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 contradict each other as to what day certain things were created on, but that can be chalked up to creative liberties being taken to make various tellings of the story fit into one narrative. The same thing happens later with the story of Abraham; it's generally accepted that there were multiple verbal accounts that were compiled and attempted to fit together once the Torah was written
I feel it's also necessary to mention that every verse in the New Testament on homosexuality was written by Paul, a man known to contradict Jesus' teachings on multiple occasionsRomans 1:26-27:
For this reason, God gave them up to passions of dishonor; for even their females exchanged the natural use for that which is contrary to nature, and likewise also the males, having left the natural use of the female, were inflamed by their lust for one another, males with males, committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was fitting for their error.
The seeds was said to accompany the previous law. You are correct in that.
The NIV, same as you, although I personally studied out of the NRSVWhat version of the Bible are you getting this from?
Romans 1:26-27:
For this reason, God gave them up to passions of dishonor; for even their females exchanged the natural use for that which is contrary to nature, and likewise also the males, having left the natural use of the female, were inflamed by their lust for one another, males with males, committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was fitting for their error.
The seeds was said to accompany the previous law. You are correct in that.
I feel it's also necessary to mention that every verse in the New Testament on homosexuality was written by Paul, a man known to contradict Jesus' teachings on multiple occasions
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
The NIV, same as you, although I personally studied out of the NRSV
You better condemn the gays then if thats what God wants. If God wants people to see homosexuals as immoral, then you better make sure you are doing what God wants, and condemn them, or else that might mean no heaven for you.Romans 1:26-27:
For this reason, God gave them up to passions of dishonor; for even their females exchanged the natural use for that which is contrary to nature, and likewise also the males, having left the natural use of the female, were inflamed by their lust for one another, males with males, committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was fitting for their error.
The seeds was said to accompany the previous law. You are correct in that.
People can argue the Bible all day and say the Bible doesn't or does say this or that. But in the End it's what God wants. No matter how right or wrong you interpret the Bible, no matter how many times the Bible was altered from its originally source, you must interpret it correctly, and gets Gods originally message from the heavily altered Book, or else that might piss of their God and possibly no heaven for them. If God want them to kill all Gays then they better do it. Or bad things could happen.Well my question.. If the bible is the "WORD OF GOD" why are there so many damn versions of it. If it is the absolute "WORD OF GOD." there should be no variations at all.
Because the original wasn't in English and there have been multiple attempts at translating that over the years.Well my question.. If the bible is the "WORD OF GOD" why are there so many damn versions of it. If it is the absolute "WORD OF GOD." there should be no variations at all.
Going to heaven doesn't rely on bad choices on Earth. It relies on if you accept the Lord into your heart and ask him to forgive you for your sin.People can argue the Bible all day and say the Bible doesn't or does say this or that. But in the End it's what God wants. No matter how right or wrong you interpret the Bible, no matter how many times the Bible was altered from its originally source, you must interpret it correctly, and gets Gods originally message from the heavily altered Book, or else that might piss of their God and possibly no heaven for them. If God want them to kill all Gays then they better do it. Or bad things could happen.
Does God care if they don't follow what he wants? Who knows? But better play it safe and kill gays just in case. Or maybe god doesn't want you to kill gays and you won't go to heaven if you do. Its like a gamble, make a choice, better interpret correctly or their could be pain and suffering for you.
I played the first Last of Us, and got bored half way. But then someone streamed it, and I seen the ending. I hated the ending, I would have shot and killed her to get the cure and save the world.Last of Us 2 made me think of this thread. Ellie, despite having a whole back story and already confirmed to like girls, I still see people spamming "sjw" all across the internet. I'm sure some are trolling and joking, but I'm sure a lot of them are serious. Most of the time, it isn't about gay people with bad storytelling (as if you can't have bad storytelling with straight people), but about some people simply not wanting to see it, but just wouldn't admit it. If Ellie was straight the whole time and shown her kissing guys, I doubt anyone would be claiming that it was "forced" or any other common complaints.
Putting the Eden story aside because my post was a very horrible TL: DR version of the story.As for the content and not current sinning standards, eating ham and all the sacrifice and ritual rules were eliminated when God sent his One and Only Son to Earth to die for all of our sins. After He did, the eating ham and such rules were no longer necessary. Homosexuality, along with the other basic rules and Laws stated in the Old Testament, are still in place because Jesus dying on the cross did not affect those laws directly. Sorry for the long reply.
I guess this is what I'm trying to say: We don't believe in homosexuality, but we don't publicy shun people who do. We might talk with people about their life choices or ask them why they do it, etc., but telling them that they're sinning makes people angry and doesn't help anyone.
no one really chooses their sexuality