hahaha as funny as this it should probably be closed now. 10 pages of this is definitely enough ha. GTA hasn't even been mentioned in 9 ha.
Wow, he's always on.Â
Sure thing Chad Warden.
(On a side note, I've never been so amused by a topic.)
hahaha as funny as this it should probably be closed now. 10 pages of this is definitely enough ha. GTA hasn't even been mentioned in 9 ha.
hahaha as funny as this it should probably be closed now. 10 pages of this is definitely enough ha. GTA hasn't even been mentioned in 9 ha.
I think it can be brought back to topic. To tell you the truth I do have a few questions about what this guy said.
Like what if the DLC is nothing more than old content recycled for the Xbox 360? (Like VCS or LCS)
Is GTA really still that popular? Is someone really going to decide which console they will puchase based entirely on this one game?
Will the PS3 version support rumble? That might interest some people.
Anyone know if it's going to be online? that would be tits.
Actually there are rumors that you can go online..Anyone know if it's going to be online? that would be tits.
probably not online. if they want to extend profits they'll save it for the sequal.
Just to put out the fanboy flames...
The PS3 has lower framerates and such in some games cause devs are still familiarizing itself with it, as it is new hardware. Although I doubt it will go the way of the Saturn...
360 has more stable games since (in terms of programming and such) it has a similar architecture to the PC. Thats why there are more 360-PC ports.
There are the infamous statements of Gabe Newell who said: "I think [PS3 is] a waste of everybody's time." And "Investing in the Cell, investing in the SPE gives you no long-term benefits.....You're not going to gain anything except a hatred of the architecture they've created."Just to put out the fanboy flames...
The PS3 has lower framerates and such in some games cause devs are still familiarizing itself with it, as it is new hardware. Although I doubt it will go the way of the Saturn...
360 has more stable games since (in terms of programming and such) it has a similar architecture to the PC. Thats why there are more 360-PC ports.
You hit the nail on the head
Devs just need to get used to making games for the PS3. They should also plan for PS3 versions of ports to take a bit longer.
That's what they said about the PS2....
This whole "developers need to get used to the PS3" line is nothing more than marketing bull****. Its just Sony's way of blaming the developers for their own incompetent hardware design.
QUOTE
Just to put out the fanboy flames...
The PS3 has lower framerates and such in some games cause devs are still familiarizing itself with it, as it is new hardware. Although I doubt it will go the way of the Saturn...
360 has more stable games since (in terms of programming and such) it has a similar architecture to the PC. Thats why there are more 360-PC ports.
You hit the nail on the head
Devs just need to get used to making games for the PS3. They should also plan for PS3 versions of ports to take a bit longer.
That's what they said about the PS2....
This whole "developers need to get used to the PS3" line is nothing more than marketing bull****. Its just Sony's way of blaming the developers for their own incompetent hardware design.
QUOTEThere are the infamous statements of Gabe Newell who said: "I think [PS3 is] a waste of everybody's time." And "Investing in the Cell, investing in the SPE gives you no long-term benefits.....You're not going to gain anything except a hatred of the architecture they've created."
Its no wonder devs are dumping the PS3. Blaming the devs is a rotten thing to do.
Sony Pleads With Developers Not To Abandon PS3 for Xbox 360 and Wii
Just to put out the fanboy flames...
The PS3 has lower framerates and such in some games cause devs are still familiarizing itself with it, as it is new hardware. Although I doubt it will go the way of the Saturn...
360 has more stable games since (in terms of programming and such) it has a similar architecture to the PC. Thats why there are more 360-PC ports.
You hit the nail on the head
Devs just need to get used to making games for the PS3. They should also plan for PS3 versions of ports to take a bit longer.
That's what they said about the PS2....
This whole "developers need to get used to the PS3" line is nothing more than marketing bull****. Its just Sony's way of blaming the developers for their own incompetent hardware design.
QUOTE said:There are the infamous statements of Gabe Newell who said: "I think [PS3 is] a waste of everybody's time." And "Investing in the Cell, investing in the SPE gives you no long-term benefits.....You're not going to gain anything except a hatred of the architecture they've created."
Its no wonder devs are dumping the PS3. Blaming the devs is a rotten thing to do.
Sony Pleads With Developers Not To Abandon PS3 for Xbox 360 and Wii
Sony is doing fine. Most developers got the hang of it, and the PS2 became a huge success as more and more developers got used to the Architecture. You Crygor either really hate Sony or Really love Microsoft.
Just to put out the fanboy flames...
The PS3 has lower framerates and such in some games cause devs are still familiarizing itself with it, as it is new hardware. Although I doubt it will go the way of the Saturn...
360 has more stable games since (in terms of programming and such) it has a similar architecture to the PC. Thats why there are more 360-PC ports.
You hit the nail on the head
Devs just need to get used to making games for the PS3. They should also plan for PS3 versions of ports to take a bit longer.
That's what they said about the PS2....
This whole "developers need to get used to the PS3" line is nothing more than marketing bull****. Its just Sony's way of blaming the developers for their own incompetent hardware design.
There are the infamous statements of Gabe Newell who said: "I think [PS3 is] a waste of everybody's time." And "Investing in the Cell, investing in the SPE gives you no long-term benefits.....You're not going to gain anything except a hatred of the architecture they've created."
Its no wonder devs are dumping the PS3. Blaming the devs is a rotten thing to do.
Sony Pleads With Developers Not To Abandon PS3 for Xbox 360 and Wii
Sony is doing fine. Most developers got the hang of it, and the PS2 became a huge success as more and more developers got used to the Architecture. You Crygor either really hate Sony or Really love Microsoft.
always good for a laugh.
Just to put out the fanboy flames...
The PS3 has lower framerates and such in some games cause devs are still familiarizing itself with it, as it is new hardware. Although I doubt it will go the way of the Saturn...
360 has more stable games since (in terms of programming and such) it has a similar architecture to the PC. Thats why there are more 360-PC ports.
You hit the nail on the head
Devs just need to get used to making games for the PS3. They should also plan for PS3 versions of ports to take a bit longer.
That's what they said about the PS2....
This whole "developers need to get used to the PS3" line is nothing more than marketing bull****. Its just Sony's way of blaming the developers for their own incompetent hardware design.
There are the infamous statements of Gabe Newell who said: "I think [PS3 is] a waste of everybody's time." And "Investing in the Cell, investing in the SPE gives you no long-term benefits.....You're not going to gain anything except a hatred of the architecture they've created."
Its no wonder devs are dumping the PS3. Blaming the devs is a rotten thing to do.
Sony Pleads With Developers Not To Abandon PS3 for Xbox 360 and Wii
Sony is doing fine. Most developers got the hang of it, and the PS2 became a huge success as more and more developers got used to the Architecture. You Crygor either really hate Sony or Really love Microsoft.
always good for a laugh.
You have to learn the meaning of respect.
Just to put out the fanboy flames...
The PS3 has lower framerates and such in some games cause devs are still familiarizing itself with it, as it is new hardware. Although I doubt it will go the way of the Saturn...
360 has more stable games since (in terms of programming and such) it has a similar architecture to the PC. Thats why there are more 360-PC ports.
You hit the nail on the head
Devs just need to get used to making games for the PS3. They should also plan for PS3 versions of ports to take a bit longer.
That's what they said about the PS2....
This whole "developers need to get used to the PS3" line is nothing more than marketing bull****. Its just Sony's way of blaming the developers for their own incompetent hardware design.
There are the infamous statements of Gabe Newell who said: "I think [PS3 is] a waste of everybody's time." And "Investing in the Cell, investing in the SPE gives you no long-term benefits.....You're not going to gain anything except a hatred of the architecture they've created."
Its no wonder devs are dumping the PS3. Blaming the devs is a rotten thing to do.
Sony Pleads With Developers Not To Abandon PS3 for Xbox 360 and Wii
Sony is doing fine. Most developers got the hang of it, and the PS2 became a huge success as more and more developers got used to the Architecture. You Crygor either really hate Sony or Really love Microsoft.
always good for a laugh.
You have to learn the meaning of respect.
This from the single worst user on the forum. The guy who swears at everyone and turns every topic into a fight.
This from the guy who acts like he is getting paid to defend a failing console.
Haven't you been banned yet? I'll celebrate the day it eventually happens.