What part of "stolen election" does your stupid pea brain not understand?I'm not personally in favor of removing the first amendment. I'm not saying it's wrong to support someone for something you believe is right. I'm saying that it seems you are trying to make your pride in him, as a Nazi, a bigger point than getting him into the white house, it is hurting his chances. You aren't showing real strategy, just similar impulsive self-indulgence that I accused of @tiny_tim.
Well yes, but I can always make another if I'm feeling the desire.At least you are eating it this time, like what normal people think about when seeing an apple pie.
What part of "stolen election" does your stupid pea brain not understand?
The only solution is to get rid of the commies since they are corrupt and in control of the government.
Well yes, but I can always make another if I'm feeling the desire.
Bible was edited in 1946 to remove passages forbidding pedophilia and child marriage
The English translation of The New Testament has been revised six times, most recently in 1971.Please support this claim. AFAIK the Bible was "completed" in the 5th century.
Homosexuality comes from nature, same as heterosexuality. Christianity needed a scapegoat to distract from all its own scandals though, and nobody was gonna dare to voice a defense of gay people in 1946, despite the fact that there were plenty of "Brokeback Mountaineers" behind closed doors even then.Regarding homosexuality, though, this might be interesting of a read
The English translation of The New Testament has been revised six times, most recently in 1971.
https://www.bible-researcher.com/rsv.html
Homosexuality comes from nature, same as heterosexuality. Christianity needed a scapegoat to distract from all its own scandals though, and nobody was gonna dare to voice a defense of gay people in 1946, despite the fact that there were plenty of "Brokeback Mountaineers" behind closed doors even then.
It's literally in the name, "standard." Odds are any copy of The New Testament you've seen were this one. The link compares the passages before and after the edits, and "man shall not lie with another man as he does a woman" (paraphrased) was not added until 1946. It replaced other passages about pedophilia, though it never used that exact word.That's the "Revised Standard Version";a specific translation of the Bible, and your link mentions nothing of "pedophilia".
Not interested in reading any more of the Bible than I already have, certainly. I attended a Christian middle school after too many kids were picking fights with me in the zoo of a public middle school we had in the area.You aren't interested in reading it, are you?
It's literally in the name, "standard." Odds are any copy of The New Testament you've seen were this one. The link compares the passages before and after the edits, and "man shall not lie with another man as he does a woman" (paraphrased) was not added until 1946. It replaced other passages about pedophilia, though it never used that exact word.
Not interested in reading any more of the Bible than I already have, certainly. I attended a Christian middle school after too many kids were picking fights with me in the zoo of a public middle school we had in the area.
Ah shit you're right, I thought it'd be a more complete chronicling. Here it is straight from a conservative source sheepishly admitting that homosexuality was not mentioned in the Bible until 1946, and prior to that the passages were forbidding pederasty instead.Even your "as he does a woman" isn't accounted for in your link.
You are making claims. Where are the receipts?
Funny how that translates to, "whatever is most convenient for the ruling class of the era." I suppose that's always been Christianity's gimmick though, and Animal Farm is proof that I'm not the first to notice.Overall, the intention of the Revised Standard Version was to provide a modern, accurate, and accessible translation of the Bible for English-speaking readers, incorporating the best available scholarship and linguistic understanding at the time of its publication.
Ah shit you're right, I thought it'd be a more complete chronicling. Here it is straight from a conservative source sheepishly admitting that homosexuality was not mentioned in the Bible until 1946, and prior to that the passages were forbidding pederasty instead.
https://thethink.institute/articles...-didnt-condemn-homosexual-behavior-until-1946.
Funny how that translates to, "whatever is most convenient for the ruling class of the era." I suppose that's always been Christianity's gimmick though, and Animal Farm is proof that I'm not the first to notice.
Wrong, the correct translation would've named pedophiles instead of homosexuals in Leviticus and Romans. Since it doesn't, and the topic isn't brought up anywhere else in the Bible either, pedophilia runs rampant in churches of all denominations to this day. I don't know about you, but I'd certainly prefer a bunch of openly-gay priests to ones that touch kids behind closed doors.The hiding of pedophilia you alleged is still wanting.
Well yeah at this point we might as well be calling it "Trumpianity" in the US, they only call on the Bible to justify hatred, even if that means making up passages wholesale. Christ has nothing to do with any of it.Right. Protestant Christianity, the bulk of most Christianity (besides you know) are all derivatives of Roman Catholicism, a state government posing as a religious institution (in an effort to snuff out humanitarian activists inspired by public "spiritual" movement led by Christ).
Wrong, the correct translation would've named pedophiles instead of homosexuals in Leviticus and Romans.
Christ has nothing to do with any of it.
Things weren't quite as bad when I was in middle school, but I did still have to deal with a lot of "video games/Harry Potter/dinosaur bones are the devil" type stuff lol.
I don't know how to explain it any better than that, the vast majority of scholars will tell you the same. The incorrect translation was a deliberate choice.If this topic is actually interesting to you, and you aren't fronting, I'd expect you to be more forward about the details.
Nor would they care, because again, most modern "Christians" don't even read the Bible. Israeli storm troopers justify their hatred of Palestinians with religion, the Taliban justifies their oppression of women with religion, and redhats justify their hatred of everyone who doesn't conform to their standards with religion.Christ was replaced by Constatine ages ago, most modern "Christians" don't realize it.
I don't know how to explain it any better than that, the vast majority of scholars will tell you the same. The incorrect translation was a deliberate choice.
Nor would they care, because again, most modern "Christians" don't even read the Bible. Israeli storm troopers justify their hatred of Palestinians with religion, the Taliban justifies their oppression of women with religion, and redhats justify their hatred of everyone who doesn't conform to their standards with religion.
Don't mind me lurking here. But that's just an awesome story.I may have been "lucky" but after 20 years of working at it, I finally got my parents to see that they were respecting the interpretations of fallible actors over their own, real, personal beliefs. I convinced them that they were doing a disservice by denying this aspect of "the holy spirit" (for all intents and purposes, that is what it was). Eventually, they found themselves directly clashing with the church, and ended up distancing themselves from the dogma (and the church) and love life with more confidence. This happened after giving them the space and doing my own thing, successfully, without trying to force their opinion.
Oh it's in the (second) link I provided at the bottom, the three passages are quoted there. Not only is the word "homosexual" a mistranslation, the context of the passages are also warped to some extent.Most people who are interested in understanding the meaning of passages by referring to an exact "address" of the passage, and note the words of interest, and the contention. You can start by telling me what word was replaced with "homosexual", and we can go from there.
Yeah that's fair, divorcing spirituality from the organized religion is something I voiced approval of in another thread. I would also consider myself spiritual but not religious.I don't know if I agree. I may have been "lucky" but after 20 years of working at it, I finally got my parents to see that they were respecting the interpretations of fallible actors over their own, real, personal beliefs. I convinced them that they were doing a disservice by denying this aspect of "the holy spirit" (for all intents and purposes, that is what it was). They've since distanced themselves from the dogma (and the church) and love life with more confidence. Part of it was giving them the space and doing my own thing, successfully.
Like any work of fiction, it's important to bring it up to date for modern audiences but also give fan service.Overall, the intention of the Revised Standard Version was to provide a modern, accurate, and accessible translation of the Bible for English-speaking readers, incorporating the best available scholarship and linguistic understanding at the time of its publication."
You mean all the sexual degenerate furries on the streets with kids? You mean all the gay strippers in front of our kids spreading their idealogy like a disease? How about the school teachers who spread woke Jeff Bazo's talking points making it easier for Bill Gates to brainwash even more woke into our generation and aiding in the white replacement! Our country has gone communist, and the election was stolen. And nothing short of a coup and purge will fix it.
Like any work of fiction, it's important to bring it up to date for modern audiences but also give fan service.