Look at the very first post in this thread lolSorry to be a pain, but does anyone have a link to a working CPS3 emulator for the Wii U. I've tried wiibru but the link for the retroarch CPS3 is not working.
Thanks guys
Look at the very first post in this thread lol
See post above i just added a video to it lol (now somebody please fetch me more vodka)OMG.... Thank you for pointing me in the right direction
See post above i just added a video to it lol (now somebody please fetch me more vodka)
Sorry to be a pain, but does anyone have a link to a working CPS3 emulator for the Wii U. I've tried wiibru but the link for the retroarch CPS3 is not working.
Thanks guys
I erroneously thought all DSI crashes were resolved.
the_randomizer said:Well, maybe I just won't use RA nearly as much if it's going to be so unstable *sigh* It's incredibly frustrating to wait for the Wii U to load up, enable sigpatches/CFW, then loading RA. If only the DSI errors would time out. Never gonna happen though.
A core is a separate program that gets loaded into RetroArch. If it crashes inside core code, that is not RetroArch's fault. Truthfully, none of these separate emulators have been particularly well tested on consoles, so yes, segfaults can and will happen. On PC and mobile, the operating systems are more robust so that these kind of design flaws go unnoticed, consoles are more unforgiving in that respect.
Anyway, it's a trial and error process but in the end it leads to better and more stable code. But you literally cannot look at a core crashing and then determine RetroArch is unstable, RetroArch simply loads this program into memory and then attempts to run it.
A user might not understand this whole paradigm but try to take an effort to understanding how things fit at least to avoid confusion and frustration.
I withdraw my comment, it was stupid and unnecessary. Apologies.
Read the first post.Hello everyone
I had a bit forgotten the theme of emulators in WII U.
I request your help please.
I have several emulators installed. zx, nes, snes, msx, gba ..
Where the routes of the roms must be placed for each system, and if the bios are needed, in which place of the sd.
In wii each emulator created the subfolder and you guided more or less.
In WII U the emulators do not do it.
Thanks for your help and time !!!!
Okay, that's weird. It worked fine with your testcore on my console; so I'll have to do some more investigation there. Is this also with the test core; or something else?
Have a .rpx? I can test 1080pbut i haven't tested with 1080p.
I heard 1.6.5 worked fine for many users iirc. Other users, please correct me if I'm wrong or confirm it please.Quick poll: generally speaking, would you say that the 'stable' release or a given nightly would be better for new users? I see a lot of people around the forums who grabbed the stable release off-hand, and then experienced a myriad of issues that us bleeding-edge users don't seem to have. Given that the RetroArch release cycle doesn't take the state of the console ports into account; the stable release is no different to any other nightly and doesn't really have any special significance to the Wii U. I propose we start maintaining a 'recommended build' in the OP - builds that seem to work fine and don't contain any code (like my touch driver) which hasn't been battle-tested. It means that users could get builds more recent than the stable releases that are known to work fine, unlike the stable builds which are basically random as far as we're concerned.
I completely agree with this statement.Many problems from new users come from not having a correct setup, example missing bios, borked configs, incorrect directory paths, incorrect romsets (*cough* mame *cough*) etc... and then they are reported as RA issues. So even if they use stable releases they will still have problems because the complex nature of RA configuration itself (and not reading the OP lol)
The thing is: the Wii port of RA never had this much crashes to beging with. In general is was more consumable because of that.I completely agree with this statement.
Most issues come from people who don't know how to set this up properly.
I also may add that the latest nightlies do seem stable enough (at least for me).
Can't speak for cucholix's test with the nightlies nor no one else though.