sys-clk-oc (new one) always reads correct real voltages with i2c. (both mariko/erista).
old sys-clk-oc also have real voltage readings, but erista is broken.
Last edited by meha,
4IFIR vs. Switch OC Suite real benchmark?
- Thread starter Nakamichi
- Start date
- Views 32,522
- Replies 188
- Likes 1
- Status
sys-clk-oc (new one) always reads correct real voltages with i2c. (both mariko/erista).
old sys-clk-oc also have real voltage readings, but erista is broken.
Look, for example, at Masagrator.
He has enough doubts about me. But at the same time, he does not want to offend me, and being a sane member of the community - he wants to get to the truth. He is completely adequate, you can have a constructive dialogue with him, a healthy forum discussion, in the course of which the truth is born. And now look at this one:
If GBA has degenerated into a platform for exchanging insults, and it doesn't bother you, I'll pass on participating in this circus, as it's a matter of self-respect.
However, if this is not the norm, fulfill your moderator duty and create minimal conditions for constructive discussion in the thread. By blatantly ignoring the rules in your presence, the violator is also insulting you.
The decision is yours.
A quick reminder to everyone the nominal PMIC limit on GPU is 10A which is approximately reached at max load at 1228mhz at 800mv on I think a moderately good GPU speedo.
Crossing this limit is not good to say the least.
Crossing this limit is not good to say the least.
Last edited by ChanseyIsTheBest,
I've tried both overclocking solutions for switch a few month ago out of curiosity, and came to a conclusion that they're pretty much the same thing with comparable performance. However, from quite a few reports I've seen, it looks like something has been bugged or broken in the last few 4ifir public releases. CPU heavy games appear to be dragging behind noticably on 4ifir, and it looks like Anno game is just one of the examples. I checked Anno myself, the results were the same as are posted on the first page of the thread.
I've also heard that it still there on the latest 1.9 4ifir release, even after you take your time to tune the 4ifir up on the switch, which can take up to one hour and a few reboots.
If an overclocking software requires so much commitment from me, I'm not sure if I should bother with it.
I've also heard that it still there on the latest 1.9 4ifir release, even after you take your time to tune the 4ifir up on the switch, which can take up to one hour and a few reboots.
If an overclocking software requires so much commitment from me, I'm not sure if I should bother with it.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2022
- Messages
- 19
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Krasnodar
- Website
- github.com
- XP
- 282
- Country
I hope you’ll forgive me if there’s no drama, and I’ll just show the forum members what an actual, publicly accessible 4IFIR actually looks like.
60fps for ~5.5W? Not bad.
Dont get my wrong, I have nothing against OC Suite, but...
Switch OLED. 4IFIR quickly configured via the built-in configurator, E mode. Nothing unusual.
I don’t know where he dug up this non-name pixel crap, but I have something more interesting, modes that became available with the release of 4IFIR 1.9:
ECO ST3 (faster than portable stock, 2x reduction in energy consumption)
No, these are not "good" shots. The video can be found in the Telegram community, the link to which those who need it can Google on their own.
ECO ST1 (lower TDP than portable stock, 60fps in any game)
Those who have doubts can check and see for themselves. Those who are not satisfied with this may not accept my unprecedented gift. I won't insist.
Devastator protocol? Is that the rumored brick code?
* coming here to say a bit words for 4IFIR *
Using 4IFIR, nothing wrong for a half a year. And yes, 60 fps any game:
- RDR
- AC2
- Zelda Totk
And for now i'm opening 4IFIR as also "underclock" solution. Id reduces power cunsumption when you choose lover mhz that so i get only "-2.5 W" in lego harry potter. It looks like my switch don't need a charger for now. xD
And this is without completion of last v1.9 wizard-assist tuning, just stock 4IFIR. Don't believe anyone, just try it
Using 4IFIR, nothing wrong for a half a year. And yes, 60 fps any game:
- RDR
- AC2
- Zelda Totk
And for now i'm opening 4IFIR as also "underclock" solution. Id reduces power cunsumption when you choose lover mhz that so i get only "-2.5 W" in lego harry potter. It looks like my switch don't need a charger for now. xD
And this is without completion of last v1.9 wizard-assist tuning, just stock 4IFIR. Don't believe anyone, just try it
Hi cooler!* coming here to say a bit words for 4IFIR *
Using 4IFIR, nothing wrong for a half a year. And yes, 60 fps any game:
- RDR
- AC2
- Zelda Totk
And for now i'm opening 4IFIR as also "underclock" solution. Id reduces power cunsumption when you choose lover mhz that so i get only "-2.5 W" in lego harry potter. It looks like my switch don't need a charger for now. xD
And this is without completion of last v1.9 wizard-assist tuning, just stock 4IFIR. Don't believe anyone, just try it
Cooler calls it like this:
https://gbatemp.net/threads/4ifir-vs-switch-oc-suite-real-benchmark.642354/post-10285200
I can confirm that i'm not him
I have my own site with a long history (minecraft server). We can join there and talk. Or, maybe you will offer any other ways to do so.
Post automatically merged:
I don't think that 4IFIR have things like that. First of all, for what a reason? I don't think there are any dev's who don't like users who use their software. I'm also had developed a telegram bot and i was very happy to see each user who used it. Everyone who has similar dev experience will confirm that it's amazing feeling when someone like your software.
But let's look at this from another point: is that really such easy to brick swith using software?
Last edited by N074H3CK3R,
It is easy because he forked everything, atmosphere, hekate.I can confirm that i'm not him
Post automatically merged:
I don't think that 4IFIR have things like that. First of all, for what a reason? I don't think there are any dev's who don't like users who use their software. I'm also had developed a telegram bot and i was very happy to see each user who used it. Everyone who has similar dev experience will confirm that it's amazing feeling when someone like your software.
But let's look at this from another point: is that really such easy to brick swith using software?
Without an open source code available.
And Cooler is the one who wrote this text and claimed it is included in 4ifir.
Not someone else.
edit:
@Cooler3D btw we test Anno Mutationem in docked mode
Last edited by swutch,
Ffs, next guy who comes out of nowhere to praise 4IFIR without providing any evidence, just "trust me bro, test is yourself". After seeing many people claiming bricking their Switches while using 4IFIR (Recent post about Hogwarts Legacy on reddit made some noise, funny that he believed issue is with game, not his 4IFIR setup), not everybody wants to risk doing the same. And yes, I know that you can brick the device with OC Suite too if you are careless enough, which for some reason is a more common tendency in 4IFIR userbase.* coming here to say a bit words for 4IFIR *
Using 4IFIR, nothing wrong for a half a year. And yes, 60 fps any game:
- RDR
- AC2
- Zelda Totk
And for now i'm opening 4IFIR as also "underclock" solution. Id reduces power cunsumption when you choose lover mhz that so i get only "-2.5 W" in lego harry potter. It looks like my switch don't need a charger for now. xD
And this is without completion of last v1.9 wizard-assist tuning, just stock 4IFIR. Don't believe anyone, just try it
And if you plan to do next shitty comparison like most people here, just don't.
Last edited by masagrator,
And curiously he is a new user, surely cooler sent him, as he did with many others in the past
Yep. And I echoed the same thing in that reddit thread that we've known here for almost a year now.
Honestly, there should be no questions at this point regarding the real nature of 4IFIR: the stolen code, the reverse-engineered findings, the lack of a source, and the proven problematic history of the "creator", confirmed by a bit of internet investigation, which he's refused to acknowledge probably hoping most people will miss my post or ignore all provided evidence.
- Status
Similar threads
-
- Locked
- No one is chatting at the moment.
