Good things come to those who wait my friendI am on 2.2, if they don't tell exactly what we can do I will propably update for TX when the time come.
Anyway I doubt it's as good as 1.0 and the TX solution.
Good things come to those who wait my friendI am on 2.2, if they don't tell exactly what we can do I will propably update for TX when the time come.
Anyway I doubt it's as good as 1.0 and the TX solution.
Don't update to 3.0 if you're on 2.x.
Just asking (not accusing) but weren't you working in a team with daeken ? or was there multiple teams, I forget
It's just strange that he said update to 3.0 if you want HB
In fairness I have never seen you say to update
The confusion is that you have both said different things, I know who I should have listened to now
Just asking (not accusing) but weren't you working in a team with daeken ? or was there multiple teams, I forget
It's just strange that he said update to 3.0 if you want HB
In fairness I have never seen you say to update
The confusion is that you have both said different things, I know who I should have listened to now
Well, in 3.0.0 nintendo changed some keys, but it doesn't mean that something big is coming.So you are saying that 3.0 is our best chance?!
But hey TX shared the key to decrypt STAGE2 of the bootloader (1.0.0 up till 2.3.0) they didn't mention 3.0
So i geuss that there is something special in 1.0 up to 2.3..no?
Idk if it was mentioned here.
Good < better < best
3.0.0 < 2.X.X < 1.0.0
(HB) < (HB) < (HB, CFW/emuNAND)
1.0.0 os the golden FW, but stay as low as possible for some yummy stuff.
I don't care about that. I don't want to pay to acces piracydont forget tx solution
I don't care about that. I don't want to pay to acces piracy
If the only thing that 2.X will allow is HB, there is no reason not to update to 3.0.0, which will probably have a developed homebrew scene. Read SciresM comments, for me it seems that he is mentioning CFW/emuNAND possibility for 2.X.Idk if it was mentioned here.
Good < better < best
3.0.0 < 2.X.X < 1.0.0
(HB) < (HB) < (HB, CFW/emuNAND)
1.0.0 os the golden FW, but stay as low as possible for some yummy stuff.
1.0.0 os the golden FW, but stay as low as possible for some yummy stuff.
Access to hardmod does not necessary mean access to piracy.you paid for the console though. thats access right ?
Xecuter does not necessary mean access to piracy.Access to hardmod does not necessary mean access to piracy.
Buing switch does not necessary mean access to piracy.
Bam
Look at their history. They were always doing it for money because of piracy.Xecuter does not necessary mean access to piracy.
If they have their own cfw, they can do much more than that.
He never mentioned cfw/emunand for 2.X. He might be teasing it, but never said that.If the only thing that 2.X will allow is HB, there is no reason not to update to 3.0.0, which will probably have a developed homebrew scene. Read SciresM comments, for me it seems that he is mentioning CFW/emuNAND possibility for 2.X.
Good job calling the devs moronsCan we like... pin the fuck out of this to the homebrew and hacking section for the Switch? Because there is FAR too much misinformation being spread about with morons telling others to update, and it's caused quite a fucking mess in this community with their stupid brains spreading misinformation.
Glad to be on 2.3.
Thanks, Scires!
EDIT. Just read that back to myself. Holy shit I'm an asshole. Wasn't my intent. My bad, guys!
Love me some good old cock teasing. Like what's so hard about saying I'm working on XYZ?
He never mentioned cfw/emunand for 2.X. He might be teasing it, but never said that.
(Or maybe he said it somewhere and I am blind )
still only known kernelhax are on 1.0.0 and nothing else then homebrew is confirmed for 2.X and higher.Yeah he never mentioned it specifically. But before he wrote that it is also relevant for 3.0.0, it seems that there was something in 2.X that get you one step closer to CFW/emunand. I didn't mean that is is known for sure that there will be CFW/emunand for 2.X. (That is what I meant when I used the word "possibility". As I understand, for now there isn't any known kernelhax for 2.X, which is required for that). Sorry if anyone misunderstood that.
If I understand correctly, the new ability gives you control over pretty much all the services, which mean better homebrew and bigger vector for kernel hax.
still only known kernelhax are on 1.0.0 and nothing else then homebrew is confirmed for 2.X and higher.