Im not in the discord i just reposted a image that was posted earlier in the thread, i think is the discord of atmosphere devs but i can be wrong
I hope that there is a posibility of having multiple emunands, one for homebrew and other cleaner for online, and leaving the sysnand in a low version.
Just use different sdcards. That should give you as many emunands as you want.
Overestimated? I don't get what you mean.
Also, I'd like a custom parrot theme, when it's possible please hmu!
what most people want now is being able to download patches and dlc from the eshop.
many people believe emunand will allow this but we don't know if emunand can bypass the efuses/version check right now so yea, people are asking for the wrong things and overestimating emunands.
Neither EmuNAND or SysNAND can bypass those, that's the job of a CFW. One point for EmuNAND is so we can play games legitimately online while playing backups and using hacks offline in SysNAND in order to remain ban-free
EMUNAND is to bypass the efuses/version check. One of the purpose of it. Developers have been working hard to preserve the exploit that can lead to coldboot in launch version, by working on EMUNAND.
Last edited by tivu100,
EMUNAND is to bypass the efuses/version check. One of the purpose of it. Developers have been working hard to preserve the exploit that can lead to coldboot in launch version, by working on EMUNAND.
Ehm... what?
The bypassing of the fuse-check is actually performed by the alternate bootloader (aka Fusée).
Doesn't matter what gets loaded afterwards (sysNand, emuNand, or even linux)
Last edited by MHDestination,
Perhaps try to read again and what the poster I quoted said.
I meant just like you put it: developers worked hard to get Fusee to bypass efuse checking to preserve lower firmware version. After preserving lower firmware, EMUNAND is the next step for the old firmware version can catch up with new thing in the mainstream.
What the other poster said basically is developers are blindly developing EMUNAND to complete state without knowing whether it can bypass efuse check !!!
Last edited by tivu100,
No need to read again.
You wrote:
I just said that it's not the emuNAND but the (custom-)bootloader that bypasses fuse-checks.
Tell me, what's wrong with that?
Last edited by MHDestination,
I get what you're saying. The reason some users may prefer EmuNAND is because it preserves SysNAND's firmware. If we update SysNAND, then we have to worry about fuses and the like. I think you're wording is throwing off MHDestination.
I was not trying to be technically specific on it (the poster I quoted make a general point too) as it's common sense that when you develop EMUNAND, you should have the ground work for patches for it to work already. Not blindly developing (even possible?) something so later to try to find ways to plug it in.
My apology for being so general in that post and gave off wrong idea.
Last edited by tivu100,
Got no reason to back-pedal! Just strikes me as rather pedantic to be honest.
Not really bothered
It's OK. That was an easy way for you to get out of it, and I understand. It's very clear because my initial reply to you was nice and not attacking you in any way, and then you suddenly become defensive. Like I said, I don't want to start anything, I was just trying to help because I thought you thought "SD" stood for "SanDisk", which is not correct.
Similar threads
-
- Portal
-
- Portal
-
- Portal
-
- Portal
-
-
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
@BakerMan, yeah that's about the only reason I would vote for Trump over Biden.+1 -
-
-
@
Veho:
I don't give a fuck about what happens to America but I would like it if your shit didn't spill out on the rest of the world, thank you.+3 -
-
@
AncientBoi:
I give a fuck about what happens to America but I would like it if our shit didn't spill out on the rest of the world, thank you.+2 -
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
@Veho, didn't need any news. Just going to the store and buying groceries is a constant reminder.
-
-
-
@
Veho:
Reminded that every single price gouging law was blocked by republicans because "muh gubmint overreach"?
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
The problem with X party blocked X bill that would have prevented X is that yes the bill probably would have worked great, buuuttt they put XYZDCBG in said bill as an attempt to sneak things in that tend to be completely unrelated to the original bills intent. It sucks because if they would just do a single thing they could probably get something done...
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
But congressman X needs to have government funding for his cousins unicycle business
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Rotflmao