Agreed. A lot of it seems "band wagony". Excuse me for using a non existent word.The Liberal media takes things Trump says out of context and with no reference and makes an entire story (if you can call it that) out of it. I think the OP needs to actually listen and read some more before posting such a 1-sided debate.
Agreed. A lot of it seems "band wagony". Excuse me for using a non existent word.
Agreed. On CNN and Huffington post, I see a lot of their evidence is backed up by celebrity tweets, which I'm not sure should count as a liable source to influence your opinion.Yeah, like posting something Trump said without providing any facts or context and then posting peoples Tweets in response to their made up shit is somehow passed as news.
Agreed. On CNN and Huffington post, I see a lot of their evidence is backed up by celebrity tweets, which I'm not sure should count as a liable source to influence your opinion.
And how hard will it be to raise $8bn by selling the MJ confiscated from border busts in states that legalized it (and better yet, if Trump does something to legalize it federally). He could then spin it and say "See? They paid for it. With the weed we confiscated".It really may not be feasible considering how large the US border with Mexico is. It would need to be over 6x the length of Hungary's fence or about 4x the length of Israel's final proposed wall which is estimated at around $2.1 billion, so we could say maybe roughly $8 billion for Trump's wall.
And how hard will it be to raise $8bn by selling the MJ confiscated from border busts in states that legalized it (and better yet, if Trump does something to legalize it federally). He could then spin it and say "See? They paid for it. With the weed we confiscated".
I'm no fan of Obama, but again, you need to take things in context. If you go by actual Dollars, then no president in history matches what Obama spent. Leave Bush Jr out of the picture, and you couldn't combine 6 presidents to come close. But... this article, while maybe a little too forgiving, is one of the least biased (from my own interpretation).It shows you a few different views of that picture, and it may be an eye opener.Why is the price even an issue for Liberals; don't they know how much money Obama has spent on various projects?
I fully acknowledged in my post Donald Trump's inconsistent positions.Again, you're trying to take advantage of some dumbshit thing he said, and glossing over the fact that he corrected himself. Try reading/listening to the whole damn thing instead of reading biased crap. That instance ENDED this way:
"
Mr. Trump recanted his remarks, essentially in full, a rare and remarkable shift for a candidate who proudly extols his unwillingness to apologize or bow to “political correctness.”
If abortion were disallowed, he said in a statement, “the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman.”
"
and this is "IF abortion were disallowed". Nothing like this will happen without the approval of congress in the first place. His stance on fixing jobs, economy, and imigration are spot on. Most other arguments people are having are in the wrong damn place. You need to to vote for better Senators and representatives.
Why is the price even an issue for Liberals; don't they know how much money Obama has spent on various projects?
The U.S. budget deficit is the lowest it's been since 2007 thanks to President Obama and the Democrats.I'm no fan of Obama, but again, you need to take things in context. If you go by actual Dollars, then no president in history matches what Obama spent. Leave Bush Jr out of the picture, and you couldn't combine 6 presidents to come close. But... this article, while maybe a little too forgiving, is one of the least biased (from my own interpretation).It shows you a few different views of that picture, and it may be an eye opener.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...hind-obama-and-the-national-debt-in-7-charts/
Bruh you gonna respond to my quote? You make false claims and I respond with evidence showing why you're wrong and you go on ignoring that I gave 3 heavily researched sites saying your wrong while you provided one far right site that makes up biased storiesquote
You either misunderstood my point, or you don't understand how a budget deficit works from year to year, president to president. The deficit is how much more we spend in a year than we're bringing in with revenue. As long as there's a deficit of any kind, debt accrues. President Bush severely increased the deficit with increased spending and decreased revenue. President Obama inherited that budget and cut the deficit by more than half since then. He and Congress could have potentially wiped away the deficit if a.) It had been a Democratic Congress post-2010, and b.) We hadn't been in a fragile economy in part dependent on current levels of spending and revenue.@urherenow @Lacius
I think you misunderstood my point. I don't care what Obamas spending has done, I was simply stating that he's spent a lot of money so why are Liberals upset that Trump plans to spend money too? It's not like anyone can veer into the future to see what impact it will have so that's a mute point, however it's a pretty simple argument.
You either misunderstood my point, or you don't understand how a budget deficit works from year to year, president to president. The deficit is how much more we spend in a year than we're bringing in with revenue. As long as there's a deficit of any kind, debt accrues. President Bush severely increased the deficit with increased spending and decreased revenue. President Obama inherited that budget and cut the deficit by more than half since then. He and Congress could have potentially wiped away the deficit if a.) It had been a Democratic Congress post-2010, and b.) We hadn't been in a fragile economy in part dependent on current levels of spending and revenue.
In short, Democrats tend to want to offset spending with things like revenue. There's a reason why deficits consistently go down under Democratic presidents and go up under Republican presidents. Donald Trump wants to pay for a wall that costs much more than he's claiming, and he offers no real way to pay for it. There's your difference.