Disney finalizes their $71.3 billion acquisition of Fox

NrZFDBe.png

In December, there were talks of the Walt Disney Corporation looking into buying 21st Century Fox. It was later revealed that Disney offered up $52.4 billion for Fox's repertoire. Afterwards, Comcast tried to throw their hat into the ring by bidding $65 billion, but were outbid by Disney's second offer of $71.3 billion. It took seven months for things to level out and get through without issue, and as of now, Disney has announced that they have purchased 21st Century Fox. Both Fox's Rupert Murdoch and Disney's Robert Iger were positive about the buyout, stating that they're excited the future.

Fox itself will keep Fox News, Business, and Sports, alongside any of their local TV stations. It will take until the first half of 2019 for the deal to be completed, in terms of transactions and stocks. Disney now owns majority stock in Hulu, as well.

“We’re incredibly pleased that shareholders of both companies have granted approval for us to move forward, and are confident in our ability to create significant long-term value through this acquisition of Fox’s premier assets,” said Robert A. Iger, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, The Walt Disney Company. “We remain grateful to Rupert Murdoch and to the rest of the 21st Century Fox board for entrusting us with the future of these extraordinary businesses, and look forward to welcoming 21st Century Fox’s stellar talent to Disney and ultimately integrating our businesses to provide consumers around the world with more appealing content and entertainment options.”

:arrow: Source
 

brickmii82

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
1,442
Trophies
1
Age
41
XP
2,930
Country
United States
I fail to see how this is a monopoly when you have 2 other major players in Universal-Comcast and AT&T-Warner Bros. Frankly, I’d be more concerned that Fox is dumping all of this into “news.”

Maybe now Marvel can be the ones that make a Fantastic 4 movie, and we can get an Avengers Vs Xmen series of flicks.
 

leon315

POWERLIFTER
Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
4,100
Trophies
2
Age
124
XP
4,087
Country
Italy
I fail to see how this is a monopoly when you have 2 other major players in Universal-Comcast and AT&T-Warner Bros. Frankly, I’d be more concerned that Fox is dumping all of this into “news.”

Maybe now Marvel can be the ones that make a Fantastic 4 movie, and we can get an Avengers Vs Xmen series of flicks.
but what has to do with fox? Both F4 and Xmen already belong to Mahve universe, they can ofc, make a this huge cross-over if they want.
 

TotalInsanity4

GBAtemp Supreme Overlord
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
10,800
Trophies
0
Location
Under a rock
XP
9,814
Country
United States
but what has to do with fox? Both F4 and Xmen already belong to Mahve universe, they can ofc, make a this huge cross-over if they want.
Fox owns the rights to both and it was a huge money-maker for them

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I fail to see how this is a monopoly when you have 2 other major players in Universal-Comcast and AT&T-Warner Bros. Frankly, I’d be more concerned that Fox is dumping all of this into “news.”

Maybe now Marvel can be the ones that make a Fantastic 4 movie, and we can get an Avengers Vs Xmen series of flicks.
I know that Time-Warner/Comcast was acquired by NBC, at the very least, and I don't know much about AT&T although I've heard they have their fingers in a bunch of pies as well. So, that's the issue; we're down to only a few players in the entertainment space that previously was dominated by a host of competiting studios. When you end up with media giants that big, there's simply no competition if they agree among themselves that there isn't
 

brickmii82

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
1,442
Trophies
1
Age
41
XP
2,930
Country
United States
Not to film adaptations, no. Fun fact, Sony still owns the rights to any film depictions of Spiderman, they're just cooperating with Disney to get Tom Holland's version into the MCU
Same with Universal and Hulk. Technically Universal still owns the TV and film rights to the character.

@leon315 in the 90's, comic book sales fell dramatically and while DC comics had the backing of Warner Bros., Marvel had no major conglomerate backing. So what they did to avoid going bankrupt, was sell off the film and TV rights to their more popular characters and groups at the time. Sony ended up with Spider-Man and his affiliated IP. Fox got X-Men, Fantastic 4, and their affiliated IP, and Universal got Hulk and its affiliated IP. There were other characters sold off, but I can't remember them.

Edit: Just remembered Blade. Not sure who owns the IP, but I don't believe its Marvel
 
Last edited by brickmii82,

leon315

POWERLIFTER
Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
4,100
Trophies
2
Age
124
XP
4,087
Country
Italy
Same with Universal and Hulk. Technically Universal still owns the TV and film rights to the character.

@leon315 in the 90's, comic book sales fell dramatically and while DC comics had the backing of Warner Bros., Marvel had no major conglomerate backing. So what they did to avoid going bankrupt, was sell off the film and TV rights to their more popular characters and groups at the time. Sony ended up with Spider-Man and his affiliated IP. Fox got X-Men, Fantastic 4, and their affiliated IP, and Universal got Hulk and its affiliated IP. There were other characters sold off, but I can't remember them.

Edit: Just remembered Blade. Not sure who owns the IP, but I don't believe its Marvel
so, interesting! i've no idea that even Mahve had such difficult time! basically Thanks to Disney, Mahve got a EPIC COMEBACK, and was still Disney the only responsable for saving Mahve?
 
  • Like
Reactions: brickmii82

brickmii82

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
1,442
Trophies
1
Age
41
XP
2,930
Country
United States
so, interesting! i've no idea that even Mahve had such difficult time! basically Thanks to Disney, Mahve got a EPIC COMEBACK, and was still Disney the only responsable for saving Mahve?
Marvels comic sales picked back up and they were holding ground, but not making a lot of profit. Disney bought them and sat on the content for awhile as Marvel continued to churn out comic books. They really didn't dmuch but stand back and not get in the way. What Disney did more than anything was allow a guy named Kevin Feige to take the reigns of the characters and production development. Feige had connections all around the film industry, and was an avid fan of the genre(comics). First Iron Man hit as a surprise smash at the box office, then after that Marvel Studios just dropped blockbuster after blockbuster. No single person is more responsible for the success they've enjoyed than Feige.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TotalInsanity4

TotalInsanity4

GBAtemp Supreme Overlord
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
10,800
Trophies
0
Location
Under a rock
XP
9,814
Country
United States
Marvels comic sales picked back up and they were holding ground, but not making a lot of profit. Disney bought them and sat on the content for awhile as Marvel continued to churn out comic books. They really didn't dmuch but stand back and not get in the way. What Disney did more than anything was allow a guy named Kevin Feige to take the reigns of the characters and production development. Feige had connections all around the film industry, and was an avid fan of the genre(comics). First Iron Man hit as a surprise smash at the box office, then after that Marvel Studios just dropped blockbuster after blockbuster. No single person is more responsible for the success they've enjoyed than Feige.
It should be mentioned that every Marvel movie up until Iron Man 3 was produced by Paramount Pictures, though; they had the contract with Marvel Studios first that started with Iron Man in 2008, and Disney bought everything that wasn't already owned in 2009, but obviously a legal contract supersedes an an acquisition so they (Paramount) got to finish all the movies contracted first

Also, yeah, what you said about Hulk is actually the reason there hasn't been a standalone Hulk movie since the 2008 one by Universal; per contract Disney is only allowed to use the character in crossover films
 
  • Like
Reactions: brickmii82

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    The phat model had amazingly loud speakers tho.
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @Jayro, I don't see whats so special about the DS ML, its just a DS lite in a phat shell. At least the phat model had louder speakers, whereas the lite has a much better screen.
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    They probably said "Hey, why not we combine the two together and make a 'new' DS to sell".
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's a DS Lite in a slightly bigger DS Lite shell.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's not a Nintendo / iQue official product, it's a 3rd party custom.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Nothing special about it other than it's more comfortable than the Lite
    for people with beefy hands.
    +1
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    I have yaoi anime hands, very lorge but slender.
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    I'm Slenderman.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    I have hands.
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    imagine not having hands, cringe
    +1
  • AncientBoi @ AncientBoi:
    ESPECIALLY for things I do to myself :sad:.. :tpi::rofl2: Or others :shy::blush::evil:
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    @SylverReZ if you could find a v5 DS ML you would have the best of both worlds since the v5 units had the same backlight brightness levels as the DS Lite unlockable with flashme
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    but that's a long shot
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i think only the red mario kart edition phat was v5
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    A woman with no arms and no legs was sitting on a beach. A man comes along and the woman says, "I've never been hugged before." So the man feels bad and hugs her. She says "Well i've also never been kissed before." So he gives her a kiss on the cheek. She says "Well I've also never been fucked before." So the man picks her up, and throws her in the ocean and says "Now you're fucked."
    +1
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    lmao
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    anyways, we need to re-normalize physical media

    if i didn't want my games to be permanent, then i'd rent them
    +1
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Agreed, that why I try to buy all my games on disc, Xbox anyways. Switch games (which I pirate tbh) don't matter much, I stay offline 24/7 anyways.
  • AncientBoi @ AncientBoi:
    I don't pirate them, I Use Them :mellow:. Like I do @BigOnYa 's couch :tpi::evil::rofl2:
    +1
  • cearp @ cearp:
    @BakerMan - you can still "own" digital media, arguably easier and better than physical since you can make copies and backups, as much as you like.

    The issue is DRM
  • cearp @ cearp:
    You can buy drm free games / music / ebooks, and if you keep backups of your data (like documents and family photos etc), then you shouldn't lose the game. but with a disk, your toddler could put it in the toaster and there goes your $60

    :rofl2:
  • cearp @ cearp:
    still, I agree physical media is nice to have. just pointing out the issue is drm
  • rqkaiju2 @ rqkaiju2:
    i like physical media because it actually feels like you own it. thats why i plan on burning music to cds
    rqkaiju2 @ rqkaiju2: i like physical media because it actually feels like you own it. thats why i plan on burning...