Girl's toilets are usually disgusting as shit too, leaving public toilets a mess is something most people do regardless of gender, culture, race, religion or nationality.
Japanese bathrooms are probably cleaner than your average American bedroom.
Girl's toilets are usually disgusting as shit too, leaving public toilets a mess is something most people do regardless of gender, culture, race, religion or nationality.
This story doesn't actually prove a risk, especially when you considerOoh! Ooh! I do! Here ya go.
https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/202...oudoun-county-high-school-girls-bathroom-case
Try reading what you post before posting it. This incident occurred in a girls' bathroom, while Catboy was asking specifically for proof of increased incident rates in UNISEX bathrooms. This only further proves the point that people who are intent on committing crimes won't be deterred by simple signage.Ooh! Ooh! I do! Here ya go.
https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/202...oudoun-county-high-school-girls-bathroom-case
It's just one of the go-to stories people heard from their favorite reactionary. I'd say the reading was done for them already, if there was any reading done at all.Try reading what you post before posting it.
Tell me you've never gone into a public unisex bathroom without telling me
This only further proves the point that people who are intent on committing crimes won't be deterred by simple signage.
Given that you think that when people "willingly blow their own brains out" is a matter of common sense and not... anything else (or think it's reasonable to bring up and not just weird and cruel), I don't think you should be trusted on the topic of common sense. Or anything really, given your attitude.It's sorry that "common sense" is inaccessible to the minority that willingly blow their own brains out (with chemicals or guns). There's a reason why it's "common sense" and not "universal fact" btw; as the minority's denial is what keeps it from crossing that threshold. Pretending you exist in your own world where common sense is something different is quite the contortion act.
Common sense =/= "just the way it's always been." By this same logic you would've argued that separate drinking fountains for black and white people were also "common sense." Basically boils down to the fact that you're afraid of any slight change, which is pretty sad for anyone under the age of 70.Pretending you exist in your own world where common sense is something different is quite the contortion act.
Can you rewrite that in a way that makes more sense? It seems you are saying that I think when people "willingly blow their brains out", that is a matter of common sense. The sentiment I intended on conveying is that when someone is willing to blow their brains out, it is out of a disinterest of "common sense".Given that you think that when people "willingly blow their own brains out" is a matter of common sense and not...
What information I consider basic and practical in my life differs from yours
Nothing about the definition(s) of common sense mention whatever "minority's denial" you pulled out of your ass. Meanwhile a "universal fact" is.... nonexistent in regards to Cambridge, Merriam, or dictionary.com. At best we can apply "universal" which means "existing everywhere or involving everyone" (Cambridge). Which sounds like the actual difference between it and common sense ("the basic level of practical knowledge and judgment that we all need to help us live in a reasonable and safe way") is that it's subjective and cannot involve everyone.
Not whatever vague statement about some "minority" you spend too much time imagining as "degenerate".
Common sense =/= "just the way it's always been."
By this same logic you would've argued that separate drinking fountains for black and white people were also "common sense."
Basically boils down to the fact that you're afraid of any slight change, which is pretty sad for anyone under the age of 70.
The point is that if you're going to claim an increased rate of sexual assaults or other incidents occur because of the existence of unisex restrooms, you need hard data to back that assertion; falling back on your personal definition of common sense with a sample size of one isn't gonna cut it.I'm not sure if that was common sense or not. Definitely isn't now, even if it was. It's definitely a common understanding, that those things happened. If you could further condense the point that you were trying to make, it'd be appreciated.
You didn’t read my post nor did you even read that articleOoh! Ooh! I do! Here ya go.
https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/202...oudoun-county-high-school-girls-bathroom-case
The point is that if you're going to claim an increased rate of sexual assaults or other incidents occur because of the existence of unisex restrooms, you need hard data to back that assertion; falling back on your personal definition of common sense with a sample size of one isn't gonna cut it.
I wouldn't. So what if it's a 40 year old man? If it was a women-only bathroom it could still be a 40 year old woman.So you wouldn't mind 40 year old men peeing next to your daughter?
I wouldn't. So what if it's a 40 year old man? If it was a women-only bathroom it could still be a 40 year old woman.
What, do you want to also have age-separated bathrooms too?
I wouldn't. So what if it's a 40 year old man? If it was a women-only bathroom it could still be a 40 year old woman.
What, do you want to also have age-separated bathrooms too?
Again: based on what evidence/data? As long as horniness has existed, so has sex in public restrooms. A stick figure silhouette of a person in pants or a person in a dress has never and will never be enough to deter anyone. Especially, but not exclusively, if there are drugs or alcohol involved.The claim is that the increased reservation of co-ed, un-surveilled, areas, accessible to the public, can only have a net-positive effect in relation to sexual acts; good and bad.
We've had unisex and family bathrooms for just as long. Work that into your common sense calculator and get back to me, assuming it doesn't break your brain in the process.Considering that you don't seem to have an idea why we have separate bathrooms puts you into that minority box that doesn't grasp common sense.
Again: based on what evidence/data?
As long as horniness has existed, so has sex in public restrooms.
We've had unisex and family bathrooms for just as long.
Correct it how? This is basically telling on yourself that you've never been to a concert or music festival in your life.I lol'd. If you can't correct this statement, then it's going to become my new signature.
As long as we've had separate bathrooms in some buildings, there have been unisex bathrooms in others. It's never been a big deal and it still isn't. Your only tactic here is an appeal to emotionality and rigid 1950s Christian morals (which were at best hypocritical even at that time), so it's not a very good tactic.As long as what; sexual assault? I'm not pretending unisex bathrooms are a brand new concept.
I never said or implied that. I'm saying unisex bathrooms don't magically increase the amount of consensual or non-consensual sex people have in public restrooms. The rate stays exactly the same.You seem to be on this irrational crusade to suggest that people will avoid sex because of unisex toilets.
Correct it how? This is just basically telling on yourself that you've never been to a concert or music festival in your life. The fact that biology text-books don't mention it is simply a crime. Someday, our biology textbooks will be updated.
As long as we've had separate bathrooms in some buildings, there have been unisex bathrooms in others. It's never been a big deal and it still isn't. Your only tactic here is an appeal to emotionality and rigid 1950s Christian morals (which were at best hypocritical even at that time), so it's not a very good tactic.
I'm saying unisex bathrooms don't magically increase the amount of consensual or non-consensual sex people have in public restrooms. The rate stays exactly the same