I would never wish Uncharted: Drake's Fortune on my worst enemy. It has exemplary bad gameplay. Not sure about the rest of the series, since I couldn't stomach the damned game for more than one or two minutes at a time.
*snip*
I would never wish Uncharted: Drake's Fortune on my worst enemy. It has exemplary bad gameplay. Not sure about the rest of the series, since I couldn't stomach the damned game for more than one or two minutes at a time.
-snip -
I'll never understand why EA chose to leave these guys alone instead of killing them off like they did:
-snip -
-snip -
- Clover ( Okami )
Without further ado, Crysis.
I'll never understand why EA chose to leave these guys alone instead of killing them off like they did:
- Westood Studios (the good C&C games)
- Pandemic ( Destroy All Humans )
- Bioware ( Kotor )
- Clover ( Okami )
I would never wish Uncharted: Drake's Fortune on my worst enemy. It has exemplary bad gameplay. Not sure about the rest of the series, since I couldn't stomach the damned game for more than one or two minutes at a time.
Ultra Street Fighter 4, because it's going to be the exact same bloody game yet again, re-released under a new name instead of being distributed as DLC for the original.
Completely agree. I liked the cutscenes more than the game itself, which seems to happen quite regularly with modern ND games to me. Probably because their gameplay has absolutely no redeeming qualities other than being the best example of polished mediocrity.I would never wish Uncharted: Drake's Fortune on my worst enemy. It has exemplary bad gameplay. Not sure about the rest of the series, since I couldn't stomach the damned game for more than one or two minutes at a time.
Completely agree. I liked the cutscenes more than the game itself, which seems to happen quite regularly with modern ND games to me. Probably because their gameplay has absolutely no redeeming qualities other than being the best example of polished mediocrity.
Explain. It looks exactly the same to me apart from one new gameplay mechanic.Wrong. Do your research, Foxi4.
Explain. It looks exactly the same to me apart from one new gameplay mechanic.
Well then maybe he should read the whole conversation before angrily punching the keyboard since I also said this:It's available as DLC I think as well, I think that's what he meant.
[Someone mentioned it's going to be DLC] Oh? I didn't know that - fair enough then, suggestion retracted.
[Someone mentioned that it will be DLC for Super Street Fighter IV, which I can't verify because I can't be arsed] There we go then - we have Street Fighter IV, Super Street Fighter IV and now Ultra Street Fighter IV in the form of a full retail game or Super Street Fighter IV DLC. Here's a thought - just release Street Fighter V, what's the problem with doing that? Capcom's been doing this for ages, it's really annoying.
You forgot Super Street Fighter IV : Arcade Edition on PC, PS3 and 360Well then maybe he should read the whole conversation before angrily punching the keyboard since I also said this:
People complain about Nintendo releasing two or three exact same games with different Pokemon in them all the time, but Street Fighter takes the cake. It's not even relevant updates most of the time, they're cosmetic at best.You forgot Super Street Fighter IV : Arcade Edition on PC, PS3 and 360
Well, at least in the pokémon franchise, it has a meaning : trading. With Street Fighter it's not quite the same (4 iterations, and I'm not counting the ver. 2012 update cause it was free, ad the SF X Tekken even if it's the same engine)... The only good thing is that the price of the game drop a little bit with each iteration of the gamePeople complain about Nintendo releasing two or three exact same games with different Pokemon in them all the time, but Street Fighter takes the cake. It's not even relevant updates most of the time, they're cosmetic at best.
It has absolutely no meaning - people would still trade if the games contained all the Pokemons. The reason why there's two or three versions is that there are people out there who are such Pokemon nutters that they'll grab all the games "just because", it's a matter of maximizing profit.Well, at least in the pokémon franchise, it has a meaning : trading. With Street Fighter it's not quite the same (4 iterations, and I'm not counting the ver. 2012 update cause it was free, ad the SF X Tekken even if it's the same engine)... The only good thing is that the price of the game drop a little bit with each iteration of the game
I like to think that if people buy more than one version, they haven't really understood the concept of having multiple versions Anyway it's just my humble opinion Concerning the fact that people would still trade with only one version, you're right, but I think there would be less trades. Relasing two version of the game creates a need which can be fulfilled by playing with oter people (the good side) or buying an extra console and an extra game (bad side). But like I said, for me, people who buy another one don't really understand one of the main concept of the game.It has absolutely no meaning - people would still trade if the games contained all the Pokemons. The reason why there's two or three versions is that there are people out there who are such Pokemon nutters that they'll grab all the games "just because", it's a matter of maximizing profit.
Ha! I bought Pokemon Yellow and Pokemon Red myself because my best friend only had Blue and Green was not distributed in my area. By extension, we needed the three games to complete our Pokedexes... so I double-dipped. Now it's much less of an issue with online trading around, but back in the offline cable-based trading days this was a big deal.I like to think that if people buy more than one version, they haven't really understood the concept of having multiple versions Anyway it's just my humble opinion Concerning the fact that people would still trade with only one version, you're right, but I think there would be less trades. Relasing two version of the game creates a need which can be fulfilled by playing with oter people (the good side) or buying an extra console and an extra game (bad side). But like I said, for me, people who buy another one don't really understand one of the main concept of the game.
Pokemon Yellow is kind of an exception here since they added a few new things Did you buy Yellow first ?Ha! I bought Pokemon Yellow and Pokemon Red myself because my best friend only had Blue and Green was not distributed in my area. By extension, we needed the three games to complete our Pokedexes... so I double-dipped. Now it's much less of an issue with online trading around, but back in the offline cable-based trading days this was a big deal.