- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
- Messages
- 4,839
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 27
- Location
- Fort Gay, West Virginia
- XP
- 2,300
- Country
So you're not at all worried if they end up censoring agendas or sites that don't align with their political views in favor of things that do align with their views? I don't want to have to pay more to get access to places I want to go to.
The issue is still that the cost is still not equal which is the central problem.
Of course but the issue is at the end the cost of access for certain websites cost more than others. Allowing faster speeds on Youtube or Netflix objectively is more costly than faster speeds on some text only website and beceause of that the ISP should have the right to decide how to handle the data. To say other wise is flawed.So what is that ~$100/mo I pay my ISP going towards? And what about the money companies pay for their Internet lines to run their servers? Is that money not being used to maintain the networks?
Last edited by RevPokemon,