^^title-1872^^

[Hunter]

^^release-1872^^

 

[Lily]

Shouldn't this be 1871, along with a few other numbering changes?

1866 - Super Mario Bros.. (J) has been removed from Pocketheaven, and it seems to have shaken up the recent list a bit.

Either way,

 

[Dirtie]

Why'd it get removed?

 

[Hunter]

no since "1866 - Super Mario Bros.. (J)" is a 100% legitimate release just because it's 1.0 and not 1.1 there are many roms with multiple revisions look at pokemon there's heaps there why arnt some of them nuked???
just because it was released by Trashman isnt enough of a excuse.

 

[speechless]

everybody hates teh trashman

*sulks slowly away*

good thing i could care less, you don't like the 'GB_te_p' release groups (aka. trashman) releases, then G.F.Y. !!!

imma go back to bong, you guys keep up the hating and debating..

(FYI, Super Mario hot mario! campaign v1.0 rom is 100% unhacked pure dump, totally different from its v1.1 cousin.)

 

[Bitbyte]

Yup, Hunter and Speechless are right, PH is wrong. The Mario Hot Campaign rom is a gift from Nintendo, and totally different from the others. GBAtemp is right on this one

.

 

[Costello]

we'll post an official word and a poll on GBAtemp, as soon as it's back 100% ...

 

[Lily]

It's alright, I was just wondering..I hate it when the different sources don't agree..and speechless, we

teh trashman.

 

[Issac]

umm... is there any difference in that version? i mean, gameplay wise?