You use a leftwing scaremongering site to try and prove your point? That's a bold move Cotton.https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256
Thomas argued that SCOTUS should review both same sex marriages and contraceptives due to substantive due process, the same legal reason why Roe v Wade got overturned, and the same legal reason why his, and all, interracial marriage is currently legal. For now.
Where?
No, because I don't actively deny the science. I don't take every article as gospel, but I know that I don't know enough about alternative fuels to vehemently argue against the current widely accepted science.
Then why praise big government for nationwide blanket laws and needless overturns? Seems a bit hypocritical to praise the same concept you're slamming.
Who's whining? I made a comment in jest, once, quite a few posts ago, and whatever you think you're referring to actually is just me telling you to read a little better, cuz you're still having a hard time formulating actual responses to anything besides denial and tongue in cheek stabs at the left, which I still find ironic due to you supposedly being anti big government and not one to take sides. Weird.
Nice comment, considering you want the state, and the government as a whole, to meddle in abortion rights.
The government is supposed to protect life and freedoms. That's literally their main job.
There's a difference between denying science and questioning science. You might want to learn the difference.
A law was challenged, the courts took it up and made a decision. That's how it works in this country. Are you even from here, because there is so much you do not understand.
You keep whining that I'm ignoring parts of your comments. I was trying to address it so you'll stop whining.
The job of government is supposed to be to ensure life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Those rights supersede your imagined abortion "rights".