Yeah, and the thrid building that collapsed hours later on its own. Very odd.Good question. Let's see...
For me, it's somewhere in the aftermath of 9/11. While it was pretty clear al qaeda (Bin Laden) was behind it, for some reason it's just got mentioned. Not that anyone thought the country was completely on the level (i remember the gulf War from when i was young), there simply wasn't anything even remotely tieing them to 9/11.
Yeah, that has damaged the american reputation on the world stage tremendously.But for some reasons American just kept pushing the agenda and alleging those'weapons of mass destructions' existed, though there simply wasn't proof (south park later mocked their display of a random field as'proof'brilliantly).
Very good question. What are your findings on this?So i protested. Fuck... Everyone in the eu did. And for good reason: the us were the good guys until that point. And they were attacked... So why the hell were they planning on attacking a completely different country in a completely different part of the world for a completely different reason?
I will put that in my bookmarks. ThxThe defining point, if you want to call it that, was me watching the documentary 'outfoxed'. It just... Helped me understood the madness the country went in: a self proclaimed news network that twisted news rather than covering it, coupled with the arrogance that they were telling the truth.
Thanks for sharing. So the 911 event seems to be a significant one. Perhaps the ethnic cleansing and the basically unjustified war against iraq and afghanistan might be connected.It was a long time ago, but I suppose it was primarily 9/11 which eventually led to studying the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. It's been a real god damn exhausting can of worms.
I'm sorry to hear that.The 2008 financial crisis was very impactful in my country and it happened in my early teens; the austerity that followed shaped my family's life forever.
NiceAdding to it, I moved to a new school with a completely different setting of thought. Before, I spent my time talking about science and technology and playing videogames with my friends. But my new classmates and teachers were more interested in human rights, equality and the humanistic dimension. In this context, I and my classmates found ourselves in school debates and student-organized protests.
Thank you for sharing your story.
I'm sorry to hear that.
Maybe you have another story that is more masculine?Damn, Cat, I didn't mean to sound like a snowflake.
Yes. As far as I know soy in the us is extremely toxic and leads to estrogen dominance.For me it was soy
Yes, unfortunatly there is litte awareness on this one. EMF radiation grinds you down slowly.EMF radiation
How so?& Creamu..
Maybe you have another story that is more masculine?
Yes. As far as I know soy in the us is extremely toxic and leads to estrogen dominance.
Okay lets see.That's a myth perpetuated by anti-animal rights or anti-plant based diet people. Soy is actually beneficial for the man's reproductive system. Check this out: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/soy/ ; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33383165/
This says nothing about estrogen and testosterone. In principle this statement can apply to smoking as well."Results of recent population studies suggest that soy has either a beneficial or neutral effect on various health conditions.
I don't know about nutrient-density of soy, but I highly doubt bioavailability is comparable to beef.Soy is a nutrient-dense source of protein
True processed meat is poison and a poor reference point. "Safely" is up for interpretation and no objective term. Smoking is likely to provide health benefits as well.that can safely be consumed several times a week, and probably more often, and is likely to provide health benefits—especially when eaten as an alternative to red and processed meat."
What about bioavailability?"Soy foods are rich in nutrients including B vitamins, fiber, potassium, magnesium, and high-quality protein. Unlike some plant proteins, soy protein is considered a complete protein, containing all nine essential amino acids that the body cannot make which must be obtained from the diet."
That I would have to look closer into."In a meta-analysis of 30 case-control and cohort studies from the U.S., Europe, Japan, and China, intakes of total soy foods, genistein, daidzein, and unfermented soy foods were associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer."
No significant effects is up for interpretation. Beef definetly raises testosterone would be nice to see a direct comparison."Regardless of the statistical model, no significant effects of soy protein or isoflavone intake on any of the outcomes measured were found (lowering testosterone levels or raising estrogen levels). Sub-analysis of the data according to isoflavone dose and study duration also showed no effect."
Care to elaborate?My first exposure to politics was in college in a class I took.
While it was pretty clear al qaeda (Bin Laden) was behind it
People are free to believe what they want, it's after all, free to do so.
And here's BBC the world's most trustworthy broadcast company about 9/11:
Yes.@Creamu the second link is specifically about estrogen and testosterone.
I wanted to highlight the framing of their argumentation. The problem with science is that there is a lot of room for sophistry. I didn't mean to compare smoking with soy.I don't understand why you compare the disproven concept of soy consumption's effect on men's hormonal balance with the proven fatal effect of smoking in humans.
The relevance is that for health it is not important what you eat, but what you digest. I was reacting to the claims in the quotes you have provided.I also don't see the relevance of bioavailability to your argument:
Yes. What would be a nice study is a comparison of soy intake in contrast to lean grass fed beef.in the references for that page, you can see that the numerous studies that sustain the information presented in the text were based on observation in living subjects, not on purely theoretical calculations.