- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 1,095
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 31
- Location
- Your nearest supermarket
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 217
- Country
That may not necessarily be your intention. It could be that keeping yourself on life support is taxing on your family's money, possibly emotionally taxing as well. You may be prolonging an inevitable death just because of life support, while another person who needs it and has a chance at survival is deprived of life support because of you. The point is that by taking yourself off life support, your intention may not be to end your life, but give someone else who has a better chance at survival the opportunity to have life support. I mean who knows. You may even by some miracle survive.fgghjjkll said:But by choosing to be taken off life support, you are choosing to INTENTIONALLY END YOUR LIFE EARLIER.nutella said:That' completely irrelevant to what I said. As I stated, taking someone off life support is not murder or suicide. You are not killing them, cancer is killing them.HeadHunt said:I think every life is sacred. You can't kill people because other people would benefit from it. That's the same with sick children in Africa, why don't kill them and take their organs. Sure why not, since they don't have a future. You can't think like that.nutella said:It isn't suicide if you take yourself off life support, because you die as a result of your condition. It's a different thing if you willingly take a lethal injection.
In response to your 'cancer-case':
if the cancer is spread throughout the body I highly doubt they will use any of those organs. Metastasing has already begun, so you can't risk to put an 'infected' organ in a very, very weak person (the receiving patient).
Also isn't it selfish that people want organs from a very ill person?