nutella said:
fgghjjkll said:
Thread too long, didn't read.
Though I did read some Urz and Ace Gunman posts and some other people.
I'll just throw it in here:
Let us say that someone has been diagnosed by cancer for a few years now. The cancer has already spread to many of his vital organs and will very soon reach the heart. You have been on the hospital's life support for quite a while now.
Isn't it selfish to be living your life to it's maximum when there are other people who need the life support more than you?
Some of your organs are still healthy. Why not donate them before the cancer hits those organs?
Your close friends, families and loved ones understand and accept the fact that you only have a few weeks to live. Would it not be selfish for them to keep you on life support rather than ending it now and hand over the facilities and equipment to someone who needs it more?
Hope this puts stuff into perspective.
It isn't suicide if you take yourself off life support, because you die as a result of your condition. It's a different thing if you willingly take a lethal injection.
I think every life is sacred. You can't kill people because other people would benefit from it. That's the same with sick children in Africa, why don't kill them and take their organs. Sure why not, since they don't have a future. You can't think like that.
In response to your 'cancer-case':
if the cancer is spread throughout the body I highly doubt they will use any of those organs. Metastasing has already begun, so you can't risk to put an 'infected' organ in a very, very weak person (the receiving patient).
Also isn't it selfish that people want organs from a very ill person?