LOL, once again putting words in my mouth. At what point did I say that I prefer to see apple pie as a masturbation tool?
I compared Tiki Torches to being as symbolic as Apple Pies to communicate the similar potency and function of them as symbols in the context of social agreement. I am aware of the movie, which is why I chose it. You should also have some common sense seeing that crude sex comedy isn't the lens in which everybody sees Apple Pie. I don't know if that's too nuanced for you, but that was my point. So you ignoring the point, and insisting the legitimacy of apple pie as a symbol for masturbation is exactly what you did. You do it with Tiki Torches, as did the Lincoln Project. Actions speak.
That is some epic, EPIC level of pearl clutching! I hope you didn't snap your necklace with all that clutching. What makes it even more hilarious is that you somehow found a way to circle it back to YOUR kids potentially being exposed to consequences. That's a level of living in fear that I can only look at and feel a deep sense of pity for.
"Our kids" have to deal with the consequences of the political landscape that we catalyze. Maybe you wanted a reason to say that don't care about kids if they are mine, so you went with "pearl clutching". Oh well. Anyway, kids were a concern that you demonstrated an interest in, and you might be proud, but you catalyze the actual problem to make it worse for them, again, even if you want to pretend your kids are the only ones that exist. It's regrettable that you can't imagine how natives would see a foreigner flipping off political activists who don't like foreigners, and how that nets a greater impact on society than your gonads. It's more potent than Apple Pie, in Japan, to see a foreigner reducing themselves to the worst of political activism. It might be racist to block foreigners from entering Japan, but when you present yourself as an unpredictable and uncontrolled radical in juxtaposition with a relatively controlled radical, the type of impact you have is predictable, you lose support. You want to present ultimatums to people because you are edgy and a tough guy. You are looking for a fight, but you are your biggest obstacle.
The point I'm trying to make is that your existence is relatively small and harmless. You try to gain relevance in trying to piss (potentially?) dangerous people off and giving them some benefit of the rhetoric by engaging in an argument. The problem is that you are arguing to embellish the conflict, strengthening both of your positions, and not really presenting a path forward out of what you see is a problem. You are against bigotry. Great. You suggested that you were doing it for your kids, lol.
I question why brag about flipping off Uyoku dantai? You obviously felt safe and protected enough. What is your end-game? Public freakouts, instigating gangs, and feeling important? What you say you don't want and how you act communicates a mixed message or someone of a low intelligence who thinks "solving" bigotry would be as easy as gassing the nazis.
I'm seeing the pattern that you aren't interested and reading or responding to what I'm actually writing. I'm not going to change you. I'm not afraid. I'm positively energized by your amazing lack of self-awareness. You are like
@Xzi, but actually admit being a nuisance in public.
I'm not gonna read all this shit, and by now I can safely assume you're on the wrong side of nearly every political debate.
So, the usual, old man?
@titan_tim:
While you are actually chasing short-term self-esteem rewards and introducing (only your) kids into the justification. Let me post something that doesn't come from me, specifically. Maybe you can agree with it on virtue of it not being me.
ChatGPT:
Engaging in pointless arguments and jeering toward fringe political groups can have varying effects and outcomes, and it is essential to consider the context and your specific goals. While it may be tempting to confront or challenge such groups, it is worth evaluating the potential consequences and whether it aligns with your desired outcomes.
- Attention and publicity: Fringe political groups often thrive on attention and controversy. Engaging in arguments or jeering may provide them with the attention they seek, potentially increasing their visibility and platform. It is important to consider whether this is the outcome you desire, as it may inadvertently amplify their message or attract more supporters.
- Polarization and radicalization: Pointless arguments and jeering may further polarize discussions and contribute to an "us vs. them" mentality. This polarization can reinforce the group's sense of identity and potentially drive their supporters closer together. It may also lead to further radicalization of their members or those sympathetic to their cause.
- Constructive dialogue and education: Engaging in meaningful discussions and promoting education can be a more effective approach to challenge fringe political groups. By providing well-reasoned arguments, presenting alternative perspectives, and fostering dialogue, you have a greater chance of influencing individuals who may be open to different viewpoints. This approach focuses on understanding, empathy, and critical thinking rather than personal attacks or pointless arguments.
- Other forms of action: Instead of engaging in pointless arguments, you may consider channeling your energy and efforts into constructive actions that promote your own values and beliefs. This can include supporting organizations or initiatives that advocate for positive change, promoting inclusivity and tolerance, and engaging in meaningful civic participation.
Ultimately, the decision to engage with fringe political groups and how you choose to do so should be guided by your own principles, goals, and an evaluation of the potential outcomes. It is important to consider long-term strategies that prioritize understanding, empathy, and positive change rather than simply reacting in the moment.
