I really dont think its justifiable.How do you ask people to keep it civil with such a loaded question? Why do you assume that people want "[sic] their children to suffer?"
Isn't it obvious that the anti-vac people want what's best for their kids? They just disagree on what is best. They clearly have a distrust of big pharmaceutical companies which I think is extremely justified. They are misinformed and are getting their information from emotional and unscientific sources. There is no doubt in my mind that they are completely wrong in their belief.
I can understand you accusing them of being misinformed or ignorant, but how can you honestly accuse them of wanting their children to suffer? It is people like you who intentionally don't understand them who push them further away from the truth. Why are they going to believe you about the science behind vaccines when you intentionally misrepresent them to such an egregious degree?
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
I agree that vaccines should be law and a child should be taken away from their parents if they refuse. Simply put, an unvaccinated child is a liability to modern day society and just furthers diseases that dont just kill them but thousands of others who have ACTUAL reasons to deny vaccination, other than, "I don't want to because another person told me [insert bullshit myth here]." Its heartbreaking to hear stories of kids dying of diseases so easily preventable. It's illogical to think otherwise.